User talk:Mb.mts

Warning
If you move the draft into mainspace again, I will block you. 331dot (talk) 15:53, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * That includes removing prior reviews. These must remain until the draft is accepted by a reviewer. 331dot (talk) 16:02, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * @331dot I have fixed multiple errors. Please publish the page Mb.mts (talk) 16:06, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * @331dot I will not move in mainspace. I have submitted for review. Please try to get published the page. Mb.mts (talk) 16:04, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * You have not fixed the fundamental problems with the draft nor done as requested(in comments that you removed from this page). 331dot (talk) 16:09, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. 331dot (talk) 16:15, 20 July 2023 (UTC)


 * @331dot What is your problem? Mb.mts (talk) 18:27, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * @331dot you think that if you experience you can block anyone. If new editor doesn't make mistakes how they will learn. Mb.mts (talk) 18:31, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I told you that if you removed the prior declined requests from the draft that I would block you, so I did. If you are being paid to write and publish the draft most other editors- the ones who are here for free on their own time- will expect more from you than an ordinary new editor, that you will take the time to learn what is being looked for and listen to advice. You failed to heed the advice you were being given that your draft was fundamentally flawed and should have been rewritten from scratch.  It has now been rejected and won't be considered again, at least for the near future. I suggest you read WP:BOSS and have your superiors at your organization read it too. You may make an unblock request for someone else to review, but I do not think you should be unblocked if your only goal here is to edit about your organization. 331dot (talk) 18:53, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * @331dot give me the last chance Mb.mts (talk) 19:25, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * You may ask for another chance by making an unblock request as instructed. 331dot (talk) 19:46, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * @331dot I will not let you down. Please unblock me. Mb.mts (talk) 19:52, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * You still are not listening. 331dot (talk) 19:59, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * @331dot This is the last time i am requesting you please unblock my account. Mb.mts (talk) 12:32, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
 * See Guide to appealing blocks for how to appeal a block you are not following the instructions above, and please note you will not be able to continue editing the draft as it was rejected. Theroadislong (talk) 12:37, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
 * please unblock my account. Mb.mts (talk) 12:41, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
 * You appear to be incapable of reading instructions? "Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area." Theroadislong (talk) 12:49, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

I have no additional comment. You need to exactly follow.the instructions provided. 331dot (talk) 14:56, 21 July 2023 (UTC)


 * @331dot I will follow all the guidelines and instructions. Please unblock my account. Mb.mts (talk) 15:32, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Except you haven't been, and you aren't at this very moment, so you have given no reason to trust you. Okay, I have nothing more to say, please do not ping me again. You need to follow the instructions. 331dot (talk) 17:38, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prerna Parivar Welfare Foundation (July 20)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Prerna_Parivar_Welfare_Foundation Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Not notable poor sources and still just advertising.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:42, 20 July 2023 (UTC)


 * @Theroadislong it is not for advertising purpose Mb.mts (talk) 18:34, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

...
is declined, user is deliberately wasting our time on UTRS. --Yamla (talk) 16:26, 3 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Please unblock my account. It's an request Mb.mts (talk) 16:30, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
 * You know how to make an unblock request. You've been told how to make an unblock request. WP:GAB explains how to make an unblock request. You are demonstrating you fundamentally lack the competence required of editors here or simply aren't willing to listen to what you are told. --Yamla (talk) 16:53, 3 August 2023 (UTC)