User talk:Mb786

Tone issues at Ahmad Hussain Gilani
Greetings, much of what you are adding at that article violates Wikipedia's WP:Neutral point of view regulations. Also not honorifics ("RA", "SAW") are prohibited by WP:MOSISLAM since Wikipedia does not follow the labeling practices of any one particular religion. For example:

"Auspicious son was born in the house of Syed Nawab Ali Shah (RA) on Friday, 12 Rabi-ul-Awwal, 1317 A.H. (21’st July 1899 A.D). The magnificent new born was named Ahmad Hussain. He rose to fame with epithet of Abu Muhammad. The new born was to be a spiritual gem of incalculable value. He grew to adulthood with exceptional spiritual promise. His name was ringing delightfully and reverently in the nook and cranny of the Sub continent."

This type of terms/writing I have bolded do nothing to explain to a reader why this figure is important; all it says is "I like him", and frankly it diminishes the credibility of the article to have it written as hagiography rather than biography.

Further, these edits do not provide any WP:Sourcing explaining where these facts can be verified, ideally through WP:Footnoting.

If you cannot edit your writing to a more neutral tone, and provide some level of sourcing to proper books or news articles (in any language), I will put the article up for deletion. Wikipedia is simply not a place to write praise and glorification over facts. Please feel free to write me with any questions. MatthewVanitas (talk) 13:58, 22 April 2012 (UTC)