User talk:Mb99

Welcome
Hello Mb99,

Welcome and enjoy Wikipedia. Your edits are much appreciated.

These links might help you with your contributions:
 * Tutorial
 * Manual of Style
 * Policies and Guidelines

For Wikipedia-wide involvement, visit the Community Portal and the Village Pump.

Be sure to check out Australian resources, like The Australia Wikiportal, Australian Wikipedians' Notice Board, Australian Collaboration of the Fortnight, New Australian Articles and Australian stub articles. You can list yourself at Australian Wikipedians.

By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;. Preferably, use four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;), which produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page.

Again, welcome.--Cyberjunkie | Talk 03:29, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

Barnstar Award
In appreciation of your fantastic work. --cj | talk 05:17, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

Gillick competence
Hi,

Thanks for your discussion on Gillick competence. I think that Australian law does not allow concurrent ability to consent other than the statutes you mentioned in South Australia and New South Wales. In fact, I'm writing an essay about consent at the moment. Would you like to referee it for me? :D - Richardcavell 08:53, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Political correctness
Nope, no objection. I saw an unexplained removal of an entire section, which is now explained. Feel free to remove it, but you may want to explain your reasoning (if you haven't already) on the article's talk page. (ESkog)(Talk) 04:36, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Medical law
Hi,

If you want to email me, it's my wikipedia username at mail.com. I agree with everything that you say on my talk page. I wish the High Court would make it clear. Still, it makes good fodder for my essays! :D - Richardcavell 06:43, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Increasing biodiversity
Hi,

I noticed you removed the "proposed deletion" tag from the article above. However, I still believe it should be deleted; a second user (GRBerry) concurs. I'll be listing the article in the normal AfD process, and your comments would be appreciated there. --Impaciente 03:58, 21 May 2006 (UTC)