User talk:Mbarksdale4

February 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Scott Tucker (racing driver) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you.  Tide  rolls  16:17, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Scott Tucker (racing driver). Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you.  Tide  rolls  16:39, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Talk:Scott Tucker (racing driver). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.  Tide  rolls  16:41, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Scott Tucker (racing driver).  Tide  rolls  16:45, 7 February 2010 (UTC)


 * But you're not updating the article, you are blanking sections. If you want to change content, then change it.  Blanking content is disruptive.  Please stop.  Regards   Tide  rolls  16:51, 7 February 2010 (UTC)


 * If you want to create a new candidate article, go ahead and do so in the sandbox. Leave the current article in place until the new one is ready. Then it's very easy for you to go to the talk page, say "Hey, the new article version is available, how does it look?" and get it moved into the title. Do not delete the existing content, especially since you admit to having a conflict of interest. —C.Fred (talk) 16:52, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Please heed the comment given above. If you want to contest the information in the article, you may do so at the article's talk page. Be prepared to supply reliable sources—independent ones wherever possible—to back up the changes you want made. Please also review the guidelines for editing when you have a conflict of interest: while it doesn't preclude you from editing the article, it does put a greater burden on you to provide secondary sources.

Deleting content without explanation is disruptive. Disruption of an article can lead to the block of the disrupting user, as has happened here. If an article is disrupted by multiple users, it may be protected to prevent edits.

If there is incorrect information in the article, please work with us, by collaborating on the talk page, to get the article as correct as possible. If you work against the guidelines, you do so at the risk of having the article stuck with the "wrong information" in it. —C.Fred (talk) 17:07, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Scott Tucker (racing driver)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Scott Tucker (racing driver). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Scott Tucker (racing driver). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:15, 9 February 2010 (UTC)