User talk:Mbeychok/Archive6

Expanded Archive 5
I just expanded my Archive5 to include March and April of 2012. mbeychok (talk) 05:54, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Reflux(2).JPG missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Reflux(2).JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:09, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

De Laval Nozzle
In the Exhaust Gas Velocity section, why do the variables in the last few paragraphs need to be bolded? It's not hard to see them if you read that section, and I think it looks pretty annoying as it is. They should either be un-bolded or put into math format, but I'd like to leave them as HTML. AllHailZeppelin (talk) 05:53, 17 September 2012 (UTC)


 * I completely agree with you that the variables in the text should remain as HTML. However, I disagree that they should be unbolded. In my eyes, the variables being bolded makes that text section much easier to read and to understand. Perhaps, we must just agree to disagree. Regards, mbeychok (talk) 14:28, 17 September 2012 (UTC)


 * ...So that means it should be your way? AllHailZeppelin (talk) 04:32, 19 September 2012 (UTC)


 * The variables in the text were in bold font for many years before you decided to "math-ize" the variable list and then also decided to to unbold the variables in the text. I am simply of the opinion that the variables in the text should remain in bold font as they were for many years. I have no preferences regarding your "math-izing" of the variable list ... but, as I said just above, the bolded variables in the text make it much easier to read and to understand. Perhaps that is why no one unbolded them over the many years that they have been bolded.


 * Just as a matter of interest, those variables in the text have been bolded since April 2006 (six years ago). mbeychok (talk) 05:42, 19 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Ok, fair enough. AllHailZeppelin (talk) 06:49, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Activated sludge control
I wanted to thank you for editing my activated sludge control addition i made a couple of days ago. I, and other california operators, are trained with the " Ken Kerri courses". Cal state university sacramento dept of civil engineering. I shoul probably make an account but haven't yet.

By the bye, i tried to correct/edit the Sewage treatment sectin in Bioreactors and it was "undone", it has little to do with wastewater but instead tissue culture.

Perhaps, you could intervene — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.67.21.108 (talk) 19:23, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Blowdown Stack
As you seem to know about this area, perhaps Blowdown stack could use your attention. I added a ref and an external lk Regards, 220  of  Borg 08:21, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I have responded on your talk page. mbeychok (talk) 15:56, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

A message from William.....
Civility, is a great thing. I will not engage in any negative, counterproductive "edit wars" or messages with you. I will however promote and improve Wikipedia in a positive environment, comrade. Please don't forget Wikipedia is a public place. Your negative, personal attacks do no justice here. Positive thoughts, positive actions, positive words. :D Respectfully, William Cozzycovers 00:19, 9 November 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cozzycovers (talk • contribs)

Orifice Plate
Sorry didn't know how to use this talk thing this is the first time I've made an edit. Would have done this before just undoing the edit. I see now that Equations 5 and onward were all based off of the other (pretty sure incorrect?) equation for Y. I don't have the time to look at changing those until next week, not sure what to do about simplifying the mass flow equation anyway...

193.173.109.55 (talk) 15:06, 15 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks for letting me know. mbeychok (talk) 15:12, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Regret for Editing Cooling tower section
Troubleshoot of cooling towers,will help to manage the public about the defects and guide in troubleshooting of cooling towers. We need not publicise our website and no need to do so also. our approach is to help the public.

Hope you do understand amd go thru section first and then Edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.192.125.102 (talk) 11:40, 25 March 2013 (UTC)


 * When an anonymous newcomer to WP makes only one edit, the addition of a link to his/her company's website, the odds are that he/she are only interested in advertising that company's website. I did read your trouble shooting guide and found that it contained very little of real value to the Cooling tower article.
 * mbeychok (talk) 15:08, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia Meetup
You are invited to "Come Edit Wikipedia!" at the West Hollywood Library on Saturday, July 27th, 2013. There will be coffee, cookies, and good times! -- Olegkagan (talk) &mdash; Message delivered by Hazard-Bot at 03:57, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia Meetup
Help build the Wikipedia community in Southern California at "Come Edit Wikipedia!" presented by the West Hollywood Library on Saturday, August 31st, 2013 from 1-5pm. Drop in for some lively editing and conversation! Plus, it's a library, so there are plenty of sources. --Olegkagan (talk) &mdash; Message delivered by Hazard-Bot at 02:46, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=574947720 your edit] to Clean Air Society of Australia and New Zealand may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:20, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
 * //www.casanz.org.au/sigs/pages/indoorair.aspx The Indoor Air SIG page on the Casanz website].

Image:FCC.png
You have some mad Paintbrush skills(z). 76.117.247.55 (talk) 00:36, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I assume that you meant that as a complement ... and so I thank you.mbeychok (talk) 00:44, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Beychok's Cover.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:16, 3 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:BriggsLogic.png, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:15, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Milton R. Beychok
I have started the article "Milton R. Beychok". Do you wish to suggest improvements? —Wavelength (talk) 19:37, 12 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your offer, Wavelength ... but I feel that it would not be "kosher" for me to help write the original version of the article. Perhaps, after it has been written, I could then offer some comments.


 * Some brief biographies, that you may find useful, are available at:
 * The bottom section of my website's home page at http://www.air-dispersion.com
 * The top section of the homepage at http://chemengineering.wikispaces.com/ChE+Home


 * Both of those sections include a photo of myself and you are free to make use of it if you so desire. I am now 91 years old and that photo was taken about 8 years ago.


 * Best regards, mbeychok (talk) 01:15, 14 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately, the article was tagged for speedy deletion because of not demonstrating notability, and later it was deleted, possibly before you could see it. Here is a copy of the last version minus the speedy deletion tag.  (I adapted the copy for this talk page by revising the level of the headings, and by using a colon before the category.)

Milton R. Beychok was a captain in the U.S. Army, a manager of process design at the Fluor Corporation, and an independent consulting engineer.

Education
He received a Bachelor of Science in aChemical Engineeringa from the Texas A&M University, but during his student years he served the U.S. Army during bWorld War IIb in France and Germany.

Manager of process design
From 1950 to 1970, he worked for cthec Fluor Corporation, managing the chemical engineering process design of petroleum refineries, petrochemical plants and natural gas treatment plants.

Honorary award
The Beychok-Montemayor Award honors Milton R. Beychok and Art Montemayor. 

Books

 * Aqueous Wastes from Petroleum and Petrochemical Plants (John Wiley & Sons, 1967)
 * Fundamentals of Stack Gas Dispersion (Milton R. Beychok, 2005) ISBN 0-9644588-0-2

Nomination of Fundamentals of Stack Gas Dispersion for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fundamentals of Stack Gas Dispersion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Fundamentals of Stack Gas Dispersion until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:06, 17 June 2014 (UTC)


 * The Wayback Machine has archives at https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamentals_of_Stack_Gas_Dispersion.
 * —Wavelength (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Additional related information is in these page sections.
 * WikiProject Countering systemic bias
 * User talk:Jimbo Wales/Archive 165 (version of 12:50, 16 June 2014, before the nude statue was added as a metaphor of cutting away "surplus")
 * —Wavelength (talk) 02:55, 18 June 2014 (UTC)


 * After the ensuing discussion and debate of the nomination to delete the article Fundamentals of Stack Gas Dispersion, the decision was to keep the article. See Articles for deletion/Fundamentals of Stack Gas Dispersion.
 * mbeychok (talk) 03:31, 26 June 2014 (UTC)