User talk:Mbframes

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sionk (talk) 00:32, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Rushton2010 (talk) 21:45, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

I believe your improvements are enough to allow it to pass the notability criteria. However, the themes and plot sections have been copied and pasted from another website which is a violation of copyright. Please re-write these sections in your own words and use the website as a citation. Please see Copy-paste.

Anything tagged as a copyright violation is automatically blanked and put on a list for speedy deletion by wikipedia; so you will need to act quickly to remove or re-write the offending sections to avoid this.

Rushton2010 (talk) 21:50, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/In Heaven (film).
I moved Articles for creation/In Heaven (film) to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/In Heaven (film) now that the previous version of this submission has been deleted. I also changed the AFC template from "reviewing" to "awaiting review." davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  04:43, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 In Heaven (film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! RadioFan (talk) 02:54, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Michael Bindlechner
You seem to be very knowledgable about Michael Bindlechner, judging by your userid are you Michael Bindlechner himself? If not what is your connection to Bindlechner?--RadioFan (talk) 12:28, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

In Heaven (film), Michael Bindlechner
I received your email concerning In Heaven (film). In the future please leave messages on my talk page, it will be easier to carry on a conversation about your questions and concerns. Addressing a couple of your questions/concerns here:


 * For a human eye it is obvious, that this article is reliable and nothing less then libelous (unless some doesn´t doubt in the reliability of sources like the IMDB - International Movie Database, Official Homepages of International Film Festivals and others).
 * Accusing someone of libel is not to be taken likely. I'm hoping this was just a poor choice of words
 * Film festival webpages do help establish that the film was a part of that festival but doesn't do much to establish notability.
 * The reliability of IMDB as a reference is not as clear cut as you think. Keep in mind that IMDB, like Wikipedia, is maintained by user submissions.  IMDB does have oversight and each submission is reviewed but there are much better sources.  For example, you use IMDB as a source for awards the film has won or been nominated for.  IMDB is a good place to discover these awards but more reliable references such as newspaper or magazine articles on the individual awards would be far better here.
 * If such a banner is not removed (within appropiate time) from an article like this, I fear, that the (good) intention is perverted into the opposite.
 * I'm not sure how to read this.

Also, the biographical page for the filmaker has some issues. Based on the awards received, he can likely meet notability guidelines for biographies however the awards section has a serious lack of references.