User talk:Mbhangui/IndiMail

Links about IndiMail
Freshmeat Project Mbhangui (talk) 09:05, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Sourceforge Project Page for IndiMail Mbhangui (talk) 09:05, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

DKIM Deployment list Mbhangui (talk) 16:24, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

http://www.mail-archive.com/vchkpw@inter7.com/msg26223.html Mbhangui (talk) 16:26, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

http://sourceforge.net/apps/laconica/indimail/ Mbhangui (talk) 16:28, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

List of Large Sites using IndiMail
consim.com a leading internet portal in India uses IndiMail to provide DKIM signing for all its email communication.
 * consim.com, bharatmatrimony.com, indiaproperty.com, etc

http://pressreleases.merinews.com/catFull.jsp?articleID=15766628

Read 'About Consim Info Pvt. Ltd:' below for info about DKIM

http://trak.in/india/consims-indiaproperty-com-and-bharatmatrimony-com-rated-as-top-sites-by-vizisense/press-release-19912/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mbhangui (talk • contribs) 09:18, 10 September 2009 (UTC)


 * bharatmatrimony.com

% telnet mail.bharatmatrimony.com 25

Trying 72.32.59.253...

Connected to 72.32.59.253.

Escape character is '^]'.

220 mail.bharatmatrimony.com (NO UCE) ESMTP IndiMail 1.112 10 Sep 2009 10:49:55 +0530

Mbhangui (talk) 05:19, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * indiaproperty.com

Notability etc.
I appreciate that the author of this article is putting a lot of effort into it but I think it is misdirected as none of the above information is the kind of reference we can use on Wikipedia, either for notability or for verifiability. Telneting to port 25 and checking the banners is an inventive approach but it is probably original research of the type we can't use. Please refer to WP:RS for the Reliable Sources policy. This will explain the types of references that are usable. --DanielRigal (talk) 09:32, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

I am the author of IndiMail. Hence Conflict of Interest is there in me writing this. It may take time to establish numerous 3rd party references. However, the product is being used by multiple parties (mostly in India) to serve as their email server and for sending out significant mail volumes using indimail. The other point is that there isn't any commercial interest in this and the primary goal is to give ability to many to run their email server on their own without depending on proprietary software (Freedom). Please suggest if the article needs to be withdrawn. Mbhangui (talk) 05:59, 11 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for clarifying the situation. The article may have to be removed but lets see if there is any way to save it. Has the product received any significant press coverage in newspapers, magazines, research papers or the like? These do not have to be in English or on-line. If so, maybe these can be used. If the article does get deleted then this will not prevent a new article being written if the product becomes more notable later. --DanielRigal (talk) 11:56, 11 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the information that the article may/can be put back later when the product becomes more notable. There isn't any significant press coverage on IndiMail as of this moment. A popular Linux Magazine in India might publish an article. However I am not sure about the timelines. In the meanwhile I will want to improve the article. I especially do not understand the comment about that "this article is like an advertisement". So some pointers on this would help to fix/improve the article Mbhangui (talk) 14:24, 11 September 2009 (UTC)


 * OK. I think the best thing is for me to move the article into your user space. That way you can keep it and maybe publish it elsewhere. If notability improves then I suggest you work with another editor (to avoid any conflict of interest] problems) to bring it back. --[[User:DanielRigal|DanielRigal (talk) 14:31, 12 September 2009 (UTC)