User talk:Mbis Saravon

Welcome!
Hello, Mbis Saravon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Hddty (talk) 11:47, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Writing to a viewpoint
Mbis Saravon, please do not remove all instances of "Malay" you can find on Wikipedia, and similarly do not make edits that emphasise a particular national narrative, such as those removing mentions of Malaysia. Such edits are not inline with WP:NPOV, and especially in regards to removing language tags, are unhelpful to the reader. Please also consider using edit summaries to explain your so others can understand the reasoning behind them. Best, CMD (talk) 23:49, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
Your recent editing history at Malay gamelan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Austronesier (talk) 01:10, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

I expanded the article, all the sources already there, there is no such thing as edit war. (Mbis Saravon (talk) 01:12, 6 February 2022 (UTC))
 * There is: WP:edit warring.–Austronesier (talk) 01:14, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Removing reliable sources and verifiable content is form of vandalism WP:VANDAL. (Mbis Saravon (talk) 01:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC))

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Austronesier (talk) 01:26, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Malay gamelan. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 01:56, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been indefinitely blocked from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of User:Eiskrahablo&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Eiskrahablo. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has been revoked. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Girth Summit  (blether) 11:13, 6 February 2022 (UTC)