User talk:Mbwalker97/sandbox

The article is well put together. You went above and beyond gathering sources with many more than were required. The tone was good throughout the article. Including an arguments against section was a good idea for maintaining the nuetral tone required. There where no distractions, everything seemed relevant to the topic. The article seems to satisfy the checklist well. The only improvement that I could suggest is that there are currently only two sections. Adding a few more minor subheadings for supplementary information might better refine the article into being a complete page. Connor Adams (talk) 04:59, 9 November 2018 (UTC) Thank you for the input, I am glad it solidifies my wikipedia article.

The article satisfied the checklist. I agree with the above author on including more than two sections and adding more subheadings. The neutral tone was maintained and the article was very well put together. The article was relevant to the topic and I found no distractions. Marly Robertson — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcrobertson (talk • contribs) 19:52, 14 November 2018 (UTC) Thank you, I appreciate the positive input you have given me.