User talk:McFadden Gavender Advertising

September 2022
Hello McFadden Gavender Advertising. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Joy Cone, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:McFadden Gavender Advertising. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Uhai (talk &middot; contribs) 16:29, 6 September 2022 (UTC)



Hello, McFadden Gavender Advertising. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. The page Draft:Joy Cone has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

This article needs to be rewritten from scratch from reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not an outlet for promotion, advocacy, or advertising.

Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid can be located here and here, however be aware that this is not an exhaustive list. Pages can sometimes avoid these pitfalls and still be seen as an ad copy or unambiguously promotional, particularly if the editor appears to be a paid editor or has some other conflict of interest. Please review these policies, including the FAQ page on organizations to determine if this applies to you.

Common mistakes or beliefs about promotional editing center on the assumption that promotional editing only applies to promotion for commercial gain. Some tags or G11 nominations are met with confusion by creators, particularly if they spend much time reading or creating corporate documents, mission/vision statements, or similar copy for their organization. The frequent exposure to promotional tone may make it difficult to notice non-neutral phrases or styles, as the editor has grown accustomed to seeing it as everyday writing or speech. This can be difficult, but not impossible, to unlearn.

Another common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc. and CV/resumé's are by their nature promotional.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are  unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. '''That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. ''' Please see this page on citing sources. This page has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there. New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the TEAHOUSE and on IRC chat.

New article creation can be difficult and frustrating. Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined.

-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:34, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Joy Cone


A tag has been placed on Draft:Joy Cone requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://joycone.com/history/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Uhai (talk &middot; contribs) 16:30, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must: Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:35, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Not exactly. Wikipedia account names must represent individuals, not companies, organizations or groups of people. "McFadden Gavender" is the name of a company, which automatically disqualifies it for use as an account name, unless you combine it with a personal name to make it clear that one person operates this account (e.g. "John at McFadden Gavender"). Accounts must only be accessed by one person for their sole use, and never shared with anyone else.

Also, please note that a company isn't entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because it exists. Wikipedia only includes companies that have met its notability criteria, which requires that it has significant coverage in multiple reliable, third-party sources. We have no interest in what a company wishes to say about itself, as this is considered to be promotion.

You also pasted copyrighted material on Wikipedia, making your submission a copyright violation. You cannot post copyrighted material on Wikipedia - even if you are the copyright holder, or have the copyright holder's permission - unless the material has been released for use by the verified copyright owner into the public domain or under a license compatible with Wikipedia. These licenses allow anyone — not just Wikipedia — to share, distribute, transmit, and adapt your work, free of charge and in perpetuity, provided that you are attributed as the author. Also, because some derivative works may be commercial, we cannot accept materials that are licensed only for educational use or even for general non-commercial use. Releasing the material is both permanent and irrevocable. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:35, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Copyright infringement
Responding to your question in your unblock request: the history section on Draft:Joy Cone was directly copy and pasted from https://joycone.com/history/ with no indication on the webpage that the content has been released into the public domain or that it has been licensed under a Wikipedia-compatible license, meaning its inclusion on Wikipedia constitutes copyright infringement. Uhai (talk &middot; contribs) 21:07, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Also your talk page access has not been revoked so you are free to continue commenting here without needing to create unblock requests each time. Just click the reply button next to the comment you want to reply to. Uhai (talk &middot; contribs) 23:29, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you @Uhai. So I can simply reposition the section from joycone.com/history to avoid copyright issues? I thought that was the reasoning behind citing/referencing work. I appreciate the help. McFadden Gavender Advertising (talk) 13:23, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Summarization of content is allowed when the source is cited, but direct copying is never permitted unless it's done as a limited quotation. See WP:CV and MOS:QUOTE for more information.  In almost all scenarios, however, content from a company's own website shouldn't be used as a source as it is not independent nor secondary.  If no such independent and secondary sources are available, then the company likely isn't notable enough to have its own article.  In this case, even if you did manage to create an article that is encyclopedic and non-promotional in nature that also doesn't violate any copyrights, it would still be deleted. Uhai (talk &middot; contribs) 16:36, 8 September 2022 (UTC)