User talk:McFuckQueen

November 2015
Hello, I'm Sir Joseph. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Oedipus the King— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sir Joseph (talk) 01:42, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Asia's Next Top Model (cycle 3). Your edits continue to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:43, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Asia's Next Top Model (cycle 3) was changed by McFuckQueen (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.979463 on 2015-11-27T01:43:20+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Hunger Games (film), you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: The Hunger Games (film) was changed by McFuckQueen (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.965633 on 2015-11-27T01:44:19+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:44, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Captain America. Sir Joseph (talk) 01:45, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text at the end of your user talk page. Neil N  talk to me 01:47, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the Arbitration Committee's Ban Appeals Subcommittee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Neil N  talk to me 01:49, 27 November 2015 (UTC)