User talk:McKhan/Archive 2

any sources for kakazai list
Shahid masood is most probably a punjabi as he speaks punjabi and doesnt have any pashtn surname or even there is not even a single sources for that Javed ahmed ghamidi is a born is sahiwal not in pakpattan as proved by the source itself http://www.al-mawrid.org/pages/research_detail.php?research_id=5 No mention of kakazai. kakazai are very less in number mate .Maliks in punjab are mostly awan, syed, mughal, rajput and very rarely kakazai like ghulam muhammad.

Ishfaq ahmed .there is no mention of kakazai in the source or anywhere on internet. do u have any sources for that. Thankyou. Also can u tell me how can your write malik riaz as kakazai while he is rajput and that i know personally.

Can you please elaborate these points and if you can do so then i will b more than happy to revert back the edits to whatever you decide — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saladin1987 (talk • contribs) 08:33, 22 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Saladin1987, I have gone through your edits and it becomes quite apparent that you hate the Punjabis with passion. Please don't bring your Pashtun nationalism to the Wikipedia as this is NOT the place nor the venue. I am not the first editor to whom you are reverting on that very basis. Pashto has nothing to do with being a Pashtun. There are plenty of Pashtuns who live in Punjab and elsewhere and yet don't speak Pashto anymore. It doesn't make them any lesser of a Pashtun. I am going to revert your edits. Since you claim that Ishfaq Ahmed (and others) is NOT a Pashtun or Kakazai, the onus is on you to prove it otherwise. I am NOT the sole editor to that list. I have requested many times to other editors to only add NOTABLE and VERIFIABLE Kakazai. "Malik" is NOT only used by the Awans and other groups. There are considerable Kakaza Pashtuns in Punjab who also use "Malik" as their first and / or last name. It doesn't matter whether you know someone personally or not. If you think that Malik Riaz is not a Kakazai Pashtun then please bring forth the sources to prove it otherwise as you want others to bringforth the sources. Thank you. McKhan (talk) 09:00, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Ofcourse thats not the case because i dont hate punjabis i love punjabis as much as i love pashtuns. i dont disagree with your information but the thing is shahid masood is a punjabi and that is the truth. You shouldnt write that information which doesn even have any sources .i didnt write in the article that he is punjabi i just removed pashtun category.On the other hand In kakazai pashtuns most are awan maliks and rajput maliks. but instead of writing kakazai or punjabi, the article should be left without the ethnic description as neither can you prove it nor can i. the thing that i wana explain is that malik riaz is rajput for sure its coz i know that persons son personally, on the other hand javed ghamidi is born in sahiwal, its mentioned in sources then ishfaq ahmed is born as muslim but no mention that he was kakazai. Cmon MCkhan if this was the case that maliks and every khan was pashtun than there would be no punjabi but all pashtuns in punjab. Kakazai are in extreme minority in punjab and the ones that are use malik as surname which is not the case with any of the names mentioned. If you cant give me any authentic sources then i am sorry i will have to report your opinions which are completely opposite to the sources that you have provided to the wikipedia administrator. If you can prove these sources than i would be happy to accept ur edits — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saladin1987 (talk • contribs) 10:27, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Did you ever check that I have NEVER edited Shahid Masood's article before? I am afraid your information is incorrect that the Kakazai Pashtuns are in "extreme minority" in Punjab. There are plenty of Kakazai Pashtuns in Punjab and in Karachi who don't speak Pashto AND they also use Malik, Sheikh, Sardar or even Agha as their titles. But that doesn't make them any lesser of a Pashtun. You can do whatever you want. Just don't revert other editors' edits just because you don't believe them to be "correct" specially when you are not able to provide any sources to prove them otherwise by yourself. Thank you. McKhan (talk) 10:36, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Well i dont know in which pakistan you live in but sardars are mostly rajput as it was a title given to them and some are baloch too. Agha are title given to persian people. sheikh are no kakazai they are punjabis or urdu speakers. Well if you cant explain me the sources in javed ghamidi about his birthplace and no mention of kakazai then i am sorry i will have to revert the article. Kakazai are in minority, can you name any kakazai apart from ghulam muhammad with a source can you do that? Also ishfaq ahmed article there is no mention in the source its just that the information has been written by a guy like me n u who is not a very authentic personality. Brother i dnt deny it that there are no kakazai in punjab, i know there are but they are few in numbers. niazi and other pashtun tribes are more common in punjab but kakazai not really. If you can provide me with sources to the articles then i am happy to accept them but why wud u promoto wrong information if u dont have sources. http://www.al-mawrid.org/pages/research_detail.php?research_id=5(Tell me the kakazai part) ishfaq ahmed there is no source but i beleive u in that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saladin1987 (talk • contribs) 11:33, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Saladin1987, Let me reiterate that I am NOT the sole editor of that list. I have almost NEVER edited of all those articles where you are trying to instigate the edit-war.
 * It doesn't matter nor it is anybody's business whether a Pashtun wants to use "Sheikh" or "Malik" or "Agha" or something else as his/her title/last name/ first name OR even speak ANY other language (i.e. Hindko, Dari, Punjabi, Seraiki, Urdu) other than Pashto. It doesn't make him any lesser of a Pashtun NOR it throws him out of Pashtun lineage. A Pashtun is always a Pashtun. You have repeatedly demonstrated your Pashtun nationalism agenda on several of the articles on Wikipedia. As per your perception, ONLY the Pashto-speaking Pashtuns are the "real" Pashtuns which makes no sense at all. Anybody can see the evidence here, here, here, here and here. You must stop playing the "Pashto" language card and differentiating and DISUNITING the Pashtuns based upon semantics (i.e. "Pathan"), European features (NOT all the Pashtuns are "White"-looking nor all of them have European features or Green eyes. There are plenty of darker Pashtuns in Southern Khyber Pakhtunkhwa like in Bannu, Kohat, Dera Ismail Khan .etc who are even darker than the Kashmiris or Syeds.) and your own perception / definition of a Pashtun. Historically speaking, Pashtun / Pakhtun / Pathan are all the same just like Tarkani / Tarkanri / Tarklani are just ONE TRIBE despite the difference in sepllings.


 * Since you claim that the Kakazai Pashtuns are in "minority" in Punjab, please feel welcome to visit this link which has got PLENTY of information in Pashto, Urdu and English about the Kakzai Pashtuns' existense in Punjab and elsewhere even in 1600. You can also call Kakazai Association – Peshawar (Phone: 0300 8596321 | 0345 8596321), Kakazai Association – Rawalpindi / Islamabad (Phone: (051) 5739032 / 2820100 | 0300 8540510) and Kakazai Association – Lahore (Phone: (042) 37553353 / 37593382 / 37530292 | 0300 9471449 / 0333 4251883). Don't be disappointed IF they don't speak Pashto but other languages. You can also buy a book called “Tareekh-e-Kakazai Tarkani” (a.k.a. “Hidayat Afghani – Tareekh-e-Kakazai Tarkani”) from Publisher: Malik Sirajuddin & Sons, Contact: Malik Abdul Rauf, Address: F/1982, Kashmiri Bazar, Post Box: 2250, City: Lahore, Country: Pakistan, Phone: (042) 7225809 / 7225812. That book has got a huge list of notable Kakazai Pashtuns which is NOT available on the internet but only excerpts. Here is a list of Pioneer of Kakazai Association in Rawalpindi / Islamabad which also includes the names of Dr. Ashfaq Ahmad and many others.


 * Malik Barkat Ali and Abdullah Malik are just another example of Kakazai Pashtuns in Punjab who used "Malik" as their first and / or last name. And there are plenty of them in Punjab. One doesn't have to agree with this practice BUT it doesn't make them any lesser of a Pashtun.


 * Regarding Javed Ghamidi, you can always correct the place of birth in the pertinent Wikipedia article. I have got plenty of information on the Kakazai Pashtuns. Some of the sources are available on the internet and some of them are not. Some of them are not even in English but it doesn't mean that if they are not online or if you or anybody else cannot find them then they don't exist. Thank you. McKhan (talk) 03:55, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Rohail hayat is grand son of sikandar hayat khan the punjabi politician
This time i am filing a complaint against you on wikipedia. You will get the answer look at the sources in the rohail hyaat article before writing lies. i am not a pashtun, got it. Originally, his name was 'Rohail Hayat' and he is a great-grandson of Sir Liaqat Hayat Khan, a prominent Punjabi leader of British times. However, he later changed his name's spellings for artistic reasons http://www.urduwire.com/people/rohail-hyatt_422.aspx

Look at the links first. You just wana make every khan a pashtun but i have notified your edit warring and you will get the answer if your revery the change — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saladin1987 (talk • contribs) 13:50, 29 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Speaking Punjabi (or any other language for that matter) doesn't make someone Punjabi by RACE or TRIBE or ETHNICITY. I have already explained and provided ample evidence of your bias in due course in the above lines. Thank you. McKhan (talk)

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding Self introduced information on article and not responding to the sources on talk page. The discussion is about the topic Rohail hyatt. Thank you. —Saladin1987 14:33, 29 August 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saladin1987 (talk • contribs)

It seems like you dont wana understand that sikandar hayat khan was khattar tribe and that tribe is punjabi and he is his grandson rohail hayat. so what does that make him. Where is the source for pashtun that you have added. Last time i accepted your edits because i didnt had enough sources but this time there are two sources which are plenty to explain. According to you every person who is khan and speaks punjabi is not punjabi actually but pashtun then what about most jatts, rajputs,syed, arain, mian who use khan .. incase i would say khans in kpk would be mongols then coz khan is mongol surname brother. " Originally, his name was 'Rohail Hayat' and he is a great-grandson of Sir Liaqat Hayat Khan, a prominent Punjabi leader of British times. However, he later changed his name's spellings for artistic reasons" https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.156715864355957.43073.139310402763170 and the previous source.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saladin1987 (talk • contribs) 15:02, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Quit blaming me for the edits which I did NOT make. I have NOT added any source (Pashtun or otherwise) to Rohail Hayat's article. I have made just ONE edit (Reverted 1 edit by Saladin1987 (talk) to last revision by 007avenger007.) and UrduWire (a forum) and Facecook are not very reliable sources as per Wikipedia's own guidelines. And I REVERTED your edit to last revision by 007avenger007 BECAUSE under your own edit history ((here, here,here, here and here), you have been making edits with really offensive edit summaries towards certain ethnic groups. AND I have explained to you in detail on this very talk page. Thank you. McKhan (talk) 15:17, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

brother i m sorry u r my muslim brother. lets stop fighting..hope u have a really great day ..salam Saladin1987 15:20, 29 August 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saladin1987 (talk • contribs)


 * Same to you. Thak you. McKhan (talk) 15:33, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pashtun tribes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sagi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Al-Ahbash, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please read NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. Aoidh (talk) 23:24, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

kakazai
but was there any region or country named afghanistan before 1800s.. so it should have been modern day.. but its really upto you, its like saying people migrated from karachi, pakistan in 1000AD..

The word "Afghan" by itself is pre-Islamic, hence, Afghanistan (i.e. the place where Afghans live). Thank you. McKhan (talk)

Look mate you are trying to revert every article, but this time i will have to report you until and unless you provide me with a source on Javed Ahmad Ghamidi with that kakazai part, the source that is provided doesnt include any information on that. i wil have to revert your edits unless you provide me with a source. Thankyou. Also afghan doesnt mean that there was afghanistan, it means punjabis used to live in the area where alexander the great got the arrow, so shall we write punjabistan over there.. bring some sources for Javed ahmed ghamidi and start conversation on talk page to get sources but until then the category and kakazai part has to be removed. Pakpattan is a town where there are no punjabi pathans.Saladin1987 10:57, 21 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Go right ahead and report me. I can use the very same argument that you are reverting all those pages which I have been editing. On this very talk page, you have had a long discussion with me before. You are back to your old tactics. Since you also "edit" Wikipedia, thus, the onus is also upon you to research whether the information you are removing or adding is verifiable or not. You simply cannot remove / add certain information based upon your own discretion. Like I said before, it doesn't matter to me whether Javed Ghamidi is Kakazai or not but Punjabi-Pathans live almost in every corner of Punjab and yes including PakPattan, Sahiwal. The truth of the matter is there are plenty of Punjabi-Pathan who live in Sahiwal by itself. Thank you. McKhan (talk)

You dont even belong to Pakistan and you are talking about editing pakistani articles and to the most punjab related articles. the source that your provided me was based on wikipedia article. No worries i will do whatever i have to do as i know you will continue to revert the article to your personal satisfaction. Saladin1987 11:42, 21 August 2014 (UTC) It seems according to you every punjabi has certain pathan ancestry... also if it doesnt matter to you then dont add it until you can add a credible source. it will save me some time as i will have to take steps to further verify that part. Saladin1987 11:44, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

یوسف خیل listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect یوسف خیل. Since you had some involvement with the یوسف خیل redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - TheChampionMan1234 09:18, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Al Ahbash page
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. KevinAbdulqader (talk) 00:24, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Rat
Ikhwanist hog from peshwar. We know you very well. GO TO jail mohammad morsi lover. 50.117.45.69 (talk) 01:57, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Trying to Reach Consensus
&#9774;&#9774;McKhan Following the recommendation and guidelines of Mr Oshwah I am not here to start edit war but I am here to reach consensus that was why I listed the peace sign &#9774; please let me know if you are willing to reach consensus an agreement with some middle grounds or you are deadlock with your decision that you don't me to edit the page to show points of view for all the groups mentioned in Al-Habash page which include articles published by news papers and other supporting documentations.&#9774;Chaabano (talk) 23:20, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! --JustBerry (talk) 05:32, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Obsession with editing "Ahbash" Page
Hello,

I was wondering what your obsession with editing the Ahbash page is? You seem to be obsessed with this group. I have gone over your references and they lack much credibility and proper citations. Are you paid to do this or is slandering associations that fight terrorism your hobby? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AbeEll (talk • contribs) 16:49, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

your thoughts on this
In case if you are interested to share at Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents, feel free to ignore this message if you do not want to comment on this topic, regards -- D Big X ray ᗙ  12:01, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

AGF
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not do on Al-Ahbash. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. 2601:243:903:3F5B:1000:4DF4:BABA:DE06 (talk) 02:56, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Answering to MC khan(Non pushtun)
Why you blocked me Now listen! I was not enter a wrong information about my tribe .I also have a picture of shajra I do not know how to use Wikipedia .... But you've done wrong by blocking me😡 Arbaz khan Tanoli (talk) 11:33, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Al Ahbash
Hello,

I understand that you have contributed to a page titled Al Ahbash. I have gone through some of the discussions there. I have to say that while some of the information is correct, other information need to be corrected. If you wish we can discuss them in private so you can edit them before posting them on the "forum".

I will try and support my statement with the necessary documents.

Best regards,

Handybud (talk) 17:44, 27 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Please, note that this is Wikipedia, which is not a forum, thus, no private discussions. Al-Ahbash, a topic which is very much controversial, doesn't contain my sole contributions but lots of other editors' contributions as well over the years. Given that you have gone through the Al-Ahbash's Talk Page (You may have noticed that it has been discussed over and over again with the adherents/proponents of the Al-Ahbash) and given that you also adhere to the Al-Ahbash, I doubt it that something new, which has not been previously known or discussed on the Talk Page of Al-Ahbash, from a neutral point of view, containing No original research and adhering to Verifiability and other Wikipedia guideline will be brought to the table. Thank you.  McKhan (talk) 22:11, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

January 2020
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Störm  (talk)  09:01, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Kakayzai
Please stop your undiscussed reverts or I will bring this to Admin's attention. Please, assume good faith and control your temper. Störm  (talk)  08:53, 29 January 2020 (UTC)


 * I made just one edit and you have gone ahead and created the whole category arbitrarily. Did you discuss? I have already sent you a very nice email explaining everything in detail. Please go and read. Once you are ready to discuss with cool head, I will be ready as well.  McKhan (talk)


 * You are pushing your Punjabi agenda here. You have been doing it for a while now. Your edit history and even the recent one shows clearly that what you are upto. How can one assume good faith?  McKhan (talk) 09:04, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi McKhan! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 00:23, Wednesday, August 12, 2020 (UTC)

KhanKhel Or KhanKhail
✔ sir thanks for creating KhanKhel or KhanKhail sub tribe of Yousafzai, They are migrated from Swat valley Some KhanKhel called themselves Swati, Because they come from Swat and now better known as swati, but it belongs to a sub-tribe of yousafzai Located in the Hazara region of the Khyber-Pukhtunkhwa, and Swabi ,mardan área of Pukhtunkhwa, KhanKhelYousafzai (talk) 07:02, 8 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia has certain guidelines which one needs to follow in order to corroborate with the content of the Wikipedia articles. One's personal knowledge, opinions, etc. doesn't count if it cannot be verified through independently verifiable sources. I have researched Khan Khel and have created the article as there were quite a few IPs and IDs were pushing for it. One should remember that a Khel is just a sub-tribe and there could be a lot of Khels in one tribe. There are other Khan Khels in other tribes as well, for example, Khattak. I couldn't find a source that indicates that Khan Khel calls themselves Swati or originally hailed from Swat. You should remember that some historians don't consider Swatis as bonafide Pashtuns. That's why I have left the article to a minimum while corroborating with the verifiable sources without indulging in whether Swatis are bonafide Pashtuns or not and thereby avoiding putting the status of Khan Khel, a sub-tribe of Yusafzai, under doubt. I hope it helps. Thank you.  McKhan (talk) 08:50, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

KhanKhel
Sir ,thanks for correcting KhanKhel notable people, I appreciate your work, you do a very good and polite, my work is all investigated , I always do a safer work, for any doubts I like to declare doubts, KhanKhelYousafzai (talk) 13:16, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Odd revert
I've stumbled upon this revert(21:27, 23 April 2022) that you made and the warning you left in the IP's talk page... I mean I can see that that's clearly a mistake, but what were you trying to do? I don't think you even noticed it since you didn't self-revert... or am I missing something? I've reverted that revert at any rate. Cheers. – 2804:F14:C060:8A01:21D9:DCEA:CAAC:2DF6 (talk) 08:55, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Apologies. Thank you.  McKhan (talk) 15:19, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello Sir
Can you please tell me how to write Yousafzai in pashto? Because I cosider what you have written in wikipedia is wrong. Please double check and correct it Xeek.yousafzai7 (talk) 16:07, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Need Help in creating Personal page
Hello brother thank you for your last kind reply! I'm new to wikipedia and have not contributed before. can you please guide me how to create personal biography page on wikipedia? or there is no possibility? waiting for your kind response. Xeek.yousafzai7 (talk) 07:14, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Your edit on Afridi
I agree with your edit on the Afridis. I think this does require discussion but did you mean "wholesale?" "Wholesome" means nutritious,good,not evil,pure and if the change you objected to was wholesome there should be no argument about making that change. Spinney Hill (talk) 17:07, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your comment/correction. I don't know what I was thinking when I was typing. Please accept my apologies. Thank you.  McKhan (talk) 17:44, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Your signature and linter errors
Just a reminder that your signature contains obsolete font tags. They create Linter errors, and it is advised that you change your signature to  ASAP. The purpose of this message is because Linter errors affect the way the page looks, and with a lot of errors, the page may render badly. To reduce Linter errors, please change your signature. If the software doesn't accept my replacement signature, let me know, and if that's the case, unfortunately you may have to change it to something else. Sheep (talk) 16:26, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

September 2023
Hello, I'm O chawal. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Do not engage in disruptive editing as you did at Umar Khel and Yusuf Khel and refrain from descriptive editing and using of Poor, Colonial Era sources as a core reference for more see WP:RAJ or see WP:V O chawal (talk) 06:37, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Umar Khel for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Umar Khel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Umar Khel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. O chawal (talk) 07:20, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)