User talk:McLeod1

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Shalom (Hello • Peace) 04:47, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Australian Outback (TV Series)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 02:10, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Australian Outback (TV Series)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Australian Outback (TV Series), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Australian Outback (TV Series). --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 16:13, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:McLeod5.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:McLeod5.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:39, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Brothers.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Brothers.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:11, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Grace Kingston.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Grace Kingston.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 08:58, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Regan McLeod.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Regan McLeod.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:20, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Tess Charlotte McLeod.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Tess Charlotte McLeod.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:45, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Jodi Fountain.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Jodi Fountain.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:04, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Claire Louise McLeod.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Claire Louise McLeod.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:13, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Desper11.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Desper11.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 08:28, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Season8.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Season8.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 07:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Season6.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Season6.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:06, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:McLeod's Daughters
A tag has been placed on Template:McLeod's Daughters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 20:01, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Lost4.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Lost4.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:45, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Bridgwater Bay (TV Series)
What is your source? I don't find anything about this show. 87.182.219.235 (talk) 12:15, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Home and Away
I am curious to why you decided to remove sources on the home and away page and add characters without sources. It is important that all information on the home and away page is verifable true and is appropriatly sourced. As a result of this your edits were reverted. Cheers Printer222 (talk) 07:36, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

ABridgwater Bay (TV Series)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Bridgwater Bay (TV Series), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Bridgwater Bay (TV Series). Printer222 (talk) 01:56, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Bridgwater Bay (TV Series)
Another editor has added the  template to the article Bridgwater Bay (TV Series), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 02:00, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Bridgwater Bay (TV Series)
An editor has nominated Bridgwater Bay (TV Series), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:59, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Home and Away
May i ask you why you decided to remove a verifable refrence that supports the fact that a new character will be joining the show?? There was no reason specified in the edit summary and i canot think of why you would do such a thing hence your edits to Home and Away were considered to be unconstructive and have been reverted. If you have an issue with this discuss it either here, or on my talk page or on the article talk page. cheers Printer222 (talk) 05:01, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

February 2008
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Printer222 (talk) 05:17, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Your edit to Kirsty Phillips did not cite any sources when claiming that it was mentioned that she returns in TV week. If TV week did claim this, refrence the article correctly and we have no issue. As a result your edits have been reverted For more information about citing sources see WP:CITE. Printer222 (talk) 07:25, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Printer222 (talk) 09:03, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

In the last 24 hours you once again edited Home and Away and these edits included unsourced information. You have been told before but i must remind you that any edits you make should follow the wikipedia verifability policy which can be found here. Please do not make any further edits that contain unsourced information on the Home and Away page. Printer222 (talk) 00:08, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Printer222 (talk) 09:15, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Jodi.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Jodi.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:31, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Jodi9.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Jodi9.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:39, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Regan12.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Regan12.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 07:33, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Cast2.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Cast2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:42, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Unlicensed images
Just a friendly heads up. Please read the prior messages. You have uploaded a number of unlicensed images. Wikipedia is not an image repository and cannot accept unlicensed images. This page is helpful in determining the proper license and all the images you have uploaded will soon be deleted without a license. If you continue to upload them it may lead to a block.— Ѕandahl 00:02, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Grace Kingston McLeod
An editor has nominated Grace Kingston McLeod, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 13:59, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Cred2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Cred2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:30, 24 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nilfanion (talk) 01:30, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Jodifountain1.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Jodifountain1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 06:49, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of McLeods Daughters - The Second Season
An editor has nominated McLeods Daughters - The Second Season, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 15:59, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

List of Australian television series
Please note that programs are all shown in alphabetical order in this article, so that no favouritism is shown to any program or network. Your edits were reverted. Please keep the layout/standards in mind when you do your edits. Cheers. J Bar (talk) 00:08, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Drovers.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Drovers.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:21, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Drovers.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Drovers.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 01:42, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Leah Patterson-Baker
A tag has been placed on Leah Patterson-Baker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. George D. Watson  (Dendodge). Talk Help 09:43, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Leah Patterson Baker
A tag has been placed on Leah Patterson Baker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. George D. Watson  (Dendodge). Talk Help 09:46, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. w L &lt;speak&middot;check&gt; 09:56, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Leah Patterson-Baker
A tag has been placed on Leah Patterson-Baker, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. nancy (talk) 09:58, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Roman Harris
A tag has been placed on Roman Harris, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Printer222 (talk) 10:49, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Article Naming
Hi,

I Just noticed the collection of McLeod's Daughters articles which you created - ones for each season. (McLeods Daughters - The Second Season)

Just on naming conventions:

The name of the series is McLeod's Daughters, with an apostrophe. It is essential that you include the correct name of the series including this apostrophe, otherwise it is just annoying for other Wikipedians who must fix the problem.

Also, "The Second Season" needn't be in capitals. "McLeod's Daughters" is in capitals because it is a proper noun, in other words, it is the name of something. A more suitable title for this article may be McLeod's Daughters (season 1), a title used by the majority of season articles on Wikipedia (Lost (season 3), The Simpsons (season 7), Blue Heelers (season 13)).

Please remember this, as well as other naming conventions, if you choose to create more new pages.

Thanks, if you have any concerns, please contact me.

Daniel99091 (talk) 04:07, 1 April 2008 (UTC).

Suggestions
Hello again,

I just have a few more suggestions for you:


 * In the lead section of an article, the article's subject should be in bold. ''See WP:LEAD.


 * The lead section of an article is a summarised version of the article itself. A good lead should introduce a reader to the rest of the article. See WP:LEAD


 * If the article is a stub (a very short article with very little content which will be expanded), add a stub template like . See WP:STUB.


 * Remember, when naming an article, only capitalise words which must be capitalised (eg. names, places, specific things, etc.). When creating a list, like a list of characters from a television programme, a good title would be: List of McLeod's Daughters characters. See WP:NAME.


 * Instead of, use for articles about individual TV seasons (like McLeods Daughters - The Second Season).


 * Good examples of television season articles are Lost (season 3) and The Simpsons (season 7); I'm also working on the Blue Heelers season articles at the moment and modeling them on those two example articles.


 * Wikipedia favours real world information opposed to fictional information. Also, be certain to distinquish between fact and fiction; sometimes its hard to tell in some articles and its a little confusing.


 * If you want to start a new article, make sure there is enough information available on the topic. If there isn't enough, write about it in the main article. Remember, quality over quantity.


 * When uploading images, always state a source and add a rationale or the image will be deleted.


 * Add references. They are the most important thing in an article and having plenty of references is the only way that Wikipedia will come to be a respected source of quality. information. Always add references to statements which are facts and may be disputed. If you do not add such citations to statements, they will be deleted. If you need a place for references, I find newspaper articles to be a good place for things such as TV shows. [www.australiantelevision.net The Australian Television Information Archive] has a good supply of articles for many TV shows.

Thanks. If you have any comments or questions, I would be more than happy to help, as would any other Wikipedian if you asked.

Daniel99091 (talk) 06:19, 1 April 2008 (UTC).

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Drovers.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Drovers.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:25, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Home and away
Please go to WP:BALL. This policy states: Wikipedia is not a collection of unverifiable speculation. All articles about anticipated events must be verifiable, and the subject matter must be of sufficiently wide interest that it would merit an article if the event had already occurred.

Based on this it is my interpretation that speculation about characters that are either coming to the bay or leaving the bay are not premited, as first of all it is hard to 100% verify this speculation and it's really not that important, that it would merit an article if these characters had already come or left.

so i have reverted your edits that added this sort of speculative information. Thanks Printer222 (talk) 10:18, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

POV
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. --Geniac (talk) 13:54, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Copyright Violations
Hello,

Just a quick note as to why I recently reverted your edits to the McLeod's Daughters articles: You added episode summaries that were copied and pasted from another website. This is a copyright violation and cannot be added to Wikipedia. Please refrain from adding copyrighted material to Wikipedia; it will be deleted. If you would like to add episode summaries, perhaps read the summaries on other websites and create your own. That way, you are not stealing somebody else's hard work.

Thankyou for your understanding,

Daniel99091 (talk) 06:34, 21 April 2008 (UTC).

McLeod's Daughters Episode Summary Copyright Violations
McLeod1,

Would you please refrain from copying episode summaries into Wikipedia from other websites; this is a form of theft. This is, as I have said, a violation of copyright law. If you continue to add material subject from copyright, I will take this further and have you blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Thankyou, and if I am incorrect in any way, please let me know.

Daniel99091 (talk) 09:52, 23 April 2008 (UTC).

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:QD1.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Image:QD1.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:QD1.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Image:QD1.jpg and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Image:QD1.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Image:QD1.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 12:17, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Good morning. I notice that you have added several items of content that include copyrighted material. As you have been informed, we cannot accept any material, text or images, that is copyrighted. This is your final warning that continued violation of Wikipedia's policies on copyrighted material will result in your being blocked from editing. Please feel free to ask questions on what is or is not acceptable, as we are here to assist you - but, unfortunately, you will probably be blocked if you continue posting copyrighted material as you have been. Please stop. Thank you. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 12:39, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

April 2008
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Collectonian (talk) 02:44, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Melb Airport Hotels
I have removed it from the article as it's unsourced and also Wikipedia isn't a travel guide. Bidgee (talk) 12:00, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

More copyright violations
McLeod1,

I see you have again added material that is subject to copyright to Wikipedia, this time McLeod's Daughters (season 6). I also notice you have created pages for individual season 6 episodes which consist entirely of stolen text and which, in my opinion, will be speedily deleted. I, and numerous other editors, have warned you against violating copyright before, to no prevail. This time I shall be taking it further and I will be recommending you are blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Thankyou, and if you have any concerns, please drop a note on my talk page. Daniel99091 (talk) 23:31, 25 April 2008 (UTC).

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Lost And Found (McLeod's), please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Lost And Found (McLeod's) appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Lost And Found (McLeod's) has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Lost And Found (McLeod's) and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Lost And Found (McLeod's) with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Lost And Found (McLeod's).

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Daniel99091 (talk) 23:45, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Truth Hurts (McLeod's), please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Truth Hurts (McLeod's) appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Truth Hurts (McLeod's) has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Truth Hurts (McLeod's) and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Truth Hurts (McLeod's) with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Truth Hurts (McLeod's).

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Daniel99091 (talk) 23:45, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Kiss Of Death (McLeod's), please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Kiss Of Death (McLeod's) appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Kiss Of Death (McLeod's) has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Kiss Of Death (McLeod's) and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Kiss Of Death (McLeod's) with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Kiss Of Death (McLeod's).

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Daniel99091 (talk) 23:45, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Luck Be A Lady (McLeod's), please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Luck Be A Lady (McLeod's) appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Luck Be A Lady (McLeod's) has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Luck Be A Lady (McLeod's) and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Luck Be A Lady (McLeod's) with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Luck Be A Lady (McLeod's).

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Daniel99091 (talk) 23:45, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, The Real McLeod, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, The Real McLeod appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. The Real McLeod has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:The Real McLeod and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:The Real McLeod with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:The Real McLeod.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Daniel99091 (talk) 23:45, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

WP:ANI notice
McLeod, you have been warned repeatedly about your editing. There is now a discussion at Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents. You must respond to these allegations in some form or I will block you. Do not simply continue your editing. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 06:18, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Grace Kingston
A tag has been placed on Grace Kingston, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Triwbe (talk) 11:26, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Grace Kingston
A tag has been placed on Grace Kingston requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Triwbe (talk) 18:50, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Snorri Thorfinsson
A tag has been placed on Snorri Thorfinsson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Blowdart | talk 10:43, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. --Geniac (talk) 13:15, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

POV 2
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. --Geniac (talk) 17:07, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

POV 3
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Geniac (talk) 18:51, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Copyright Violations
McLeod1,

Please refrain from "copy and pasting" chunks of text from other websites and adding them to articles as you did in the List of City Homicide episodes. It is a copyright violation and will not be tolerated on Wikipedia.

The infringing text has been deleted.

Thankyou,  Daniel99091 | talk 10:00, 22 July 2008 (UTC).

Blocked
in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.

Speedy deletion of Unknown Title
A tag has been placed on Unknown Title requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. --Alinnisawest(talk) 06:31, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

McLeod's Daughters
Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, your edits will be considered vandalism and you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Geniac (talk) 15:49, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Little context in Jasmine McLeod
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Jasmine McLeod, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Jasmine McLeod is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Jasmine McLeod, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:50, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Jaz McLeod
A tag has been placed on Jaz McLeod requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Abhishek Talk 10:50, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jasmine McLeod
A tag has been placed on Jasmine McLeod requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TallNapoleon (talk) 09:39, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Grace Kingston-McLeod
A tag has been placed on Grace Kingston-McLeod requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TallNapoleon (talk) 09:40, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Close Enough to Touch
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Close Enough to Touch, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.

I have also prodded Nowhere To Hide, Three Sisters (McLeod's Daughters) and Wild Ride. – sgeureka t•c 18:30, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Claire3.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Claire3.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Stand By Me (McLeod's Daughters)
I have nominated Stand By Me (McLeod's Daughters), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Stand By Me (McLeod's Daughters). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Sceptre (talk) 11:58, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of 1 week from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. 山本一郎 (会話) 00:42, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Dave Rafter
A tag has been placed on Dave Rafter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 01:07, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

"Drovers (Fictonal Farm)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Drovers_(Fictonal_Farm)&redirect=no Drovers (Fictonal Farm)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Regards, SONIC 678 01:43, 13 June 2023 (UTC)