User talk:Mcasey666

Hey there, "Mcasey666"! Welcome new user to Wikipedia! I hope you like this place--I sure do--and want to stay. If you need help on how to title new articles check out Naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. If you need help look at Help and The FAQ, plus if you can't find your answer there, check The Village pump or The Reference Desk! Happy wiki-ing! --Infrogmation 16:40, 2 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Ian Harold Brown images
Hey -- I removed the speedy tag from the image you mention because what you said isn't a criterion for speedy deletion. What I'd suggest is, put the page on your watchlist. If sourcing / licensing is added within 7 days, nominate it for deletion at WP:IFD. If not, you can tag it for speedy deletion then, as images with no sourcing can be speedy deleted after 7 days. I read from above that you've been on WP a long time; it's possible the whole deletion process has changed. Now, we have specific criteria for speedy deletion, and different processes for pages that need deletion for more ambiguous reasons. See Deletion policy and Deletion process. Mango juice talk 15:31, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Fair use images in lists
Hello, I see you have contributed your thoughts to Wikipedia talk:Fair use/Fair use images in lists. It's been dead for a while, but I have archived it and taken a new fresh start. I hope this time we will be able to achieve something as I have summarized the main points of both sides (feel free to improve them) and I call you to express your support or oppose on the concrete proposal that I have formulated. Thanks, Renata 02:27, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Images
Hi, thanks for your support. It has annoyed me a lot, but I'm too busy these days to put any effort into fighting it. I may plan on emailing all of the MPs in the future to ask for permission to use their images.

Unfortunately these people have a different philosophy when it comes to Wikipedia than we do, and in my opinion it is ruining the quality of Wikipedia. It also reduced the enjoyability of contributing. If you were to set up some sort of arbitration thing, I would love to help out and voice my concerns. -- Earl Andrew - talk 19:00, 30 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Thank you for letting me know about the RFC, Mcasey. – Quadell (talk) (random) 18:44, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Cdn govt images
If it's as you say, then it really is curious what these folks are arguing. I must do some more reading on this issue. However, if this is just some ideological movement rather than a legal movement then I cannot hold much sympathy for this view. -PullUpYourSocks 23:01, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Mass removal of Replaceable fair use template
Please don't remove the Replaceable fair use template from images. Instead, add the Replaceable fair use disputed tag, and mention on the talk page what the dispute is about. (I'm sure it would suffice to link to the RFC, rather than having to write it out 100 times.) I've rolled back the removal of the templates, but I don't want an edit war. I've refrained from deleting those images for now, even once 7 days are up, to give it a little more time. Peace, – Quadell (talk) (random) 22:56, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Romans 13:1
In case you hadn't noticed, Romans 13:1 has been proposed for deletion. NickelShoe (Talk) 16:28, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Little context in Comedy album
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Comedy album, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Comedy album is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Comedy album, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Comedy album itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 21:28, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

I have an eye on your userpage
Haha, no, but really. My eye is on your userpage. I got a kick out of it.  hmwith  τ   16:13, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Pete Correale
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:17, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Religious paranoia


The article Religious paranoia has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No sources provided to show this is a expression is even used.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Borock (talk) 04:40, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Religious paranoia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Religious paranoia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Religious paranoia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon &bull; videos) 23:51, 7 August 2020 (UTC)