User talk:Mcasia69

Speedy deletion nomination of Doxolism
Hello Mcasia69,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Doxolism for deletion, because it doesn't seem to have any encyclopedic content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, ToastyMallows (talk) 13:28, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Doxolism


The article Doxolism has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Looks very much like a hoax page: rubbishy content and no refs

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jpacobb (talk) 13:28, 6 March 2013 (UTC)