User talk:Mcbaker

A tag has been placed on Clarity Systems, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Steve (Slf67)talk 22:54, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

More Clarity
If you really think Clarity is a suitable company for an encyclopaedic article, then have a look at Notability (organizations and companies) for the guidelines on what is needed to assert the notability: multiple, independent, secondary sources of information, i.e. information that hasn't been developed by the company in question, rather in-depth, non-trivial analysis by third parties. --Steve (Slf67)talk 00:14, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

PostRank
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of PostRank, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: AideRSS. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:43, 20 July 2009 (UTC)