User talk:Mccar408

January 2016
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 04:57, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Malcolm X
Please stop already and join the discussion I started on the article's talk page. You are misrepresenting the sources. Thank you. — MShabazz Talk/Stalk 19:49, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

March 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Malcolm X. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:44, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Request for mediation rejected
If you're interested in asking for a third opinion concerning our disagreement at Malcolm X, follow the instructions at WP:Third Opinion. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 20:49, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

January 2019
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Katherine Stewart (journalist), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. It was easy to restore coherence to the section with a few more words and a minor revision. Commenting on an article in the body of the article is always a bad idea. Comments belong on the Talk page. Tapered (talk) 02:53, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Okay! Thanks. Sorry, I'm not a very skilled Wikipedia editor. I would have fixed the sentence myself if the content had been decipherable. Glad to see you fixed it. Thanks again.

Reliable sourcing
Thanks for providing reliable sources for the article. I wasn't sure if you knew of the page at Reliable sources/Perennial sources, which provides a table reflecting previous discussions on what the community considers to be a reliable source. For your original source, there is an entry at WP:NYPOST that indicates that it is generally considered unreliable. signed, Willondon (talk) 03:08, 13 February 2024 (UTC)