User talk:Mcdragonsi

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for disruptive editing, including recreation of deleted articles, removal of speedy deletion tags, threats, and personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 17:48, 3 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Warning. I've said this twice in edit summaries. You are not permitted to remove the active block notice or the history of declines per WP:BLANKING. If you do so again, I will revoke your talk page access.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:02, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Oh, yes, and I forgot. I don't care about your warnings Bbb23. Just so you know. Martin McDowell (talk) 20:20, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Warning to Admins I am getting slowly sick and tired of you people. I am half tempted to call you what I really think and you can all **** ***. The instructions clearly stated I can "then use the unblock template" to request unblock. It clearly appears from all communication I have with admins here that you have clearly balls bigger than you keyboards and think you have been given deity-like powers to bully editors. Thank you.
 * Unwelcome comment (probably). I'm quite prepared to userfy the article for you and would have done so on request earlier. So would Bbb23, I'm quite sure. At the AN discussion, I've pointed out your good record of editing. I at least am not here to bully people. Nor are most of the admins I know. Just like non-admins and non-Wikipedians, we respond better to calm talk. Do you want me to move the article into your user space for you to finish it when you calm down and request unblock calmly (or when the block runs out if you don't), or would you prefer me to **** *** and not do it? Up to you. If I'm not around tonight, I'll respond tomorrow morning if someone else hasn't done it already. Peridon (talk) 21:24, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Mcdragonsi


Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as User:Mcdragonsi, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cpt Viraj  (Talk) 17:25, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

"Mobile World (mobile phone operator)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mobile_World_(mobile_phone_operator)&redirect=no Mobile World (mobile phone operator)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:19, 20 May 2023 (UTC)