User talk:Mcevoykt/sandbox

Peer Review: Liz Vlahos

This page is coming together. The chem box has some good information, but I would try fixing the picture so it can show up when someone goes to your page. Furthermore, I think that the reaction picture you have is helpful. Diagrams are always helpful to readers. You have a few references with is good. They are credible, but there are cite errors, which you guys will fix obviously. Also, I think that under the Reactions section, there is a box that was inserted, but I don't think that it should be like that. This is a really good page; you guys have a lot of information, and just need to add some more information, but you're off to a great start. Also, I think that your citations are good. Maybe try adding more so its more credible. Also, maybe add one or two more sections or more bulk to the other ones and you'll be set!

Lizvlahos (talk) 17:54, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Peer Review: Allison Brown

There is quite a bit of good information present on this page, nice job hunting it all down! You have some very reliable sources you've been drawing from and you linked them into the article, so that is awesome. If you can find more information, you could add another subcategory, but the information present is a decent overview of this chemical. The chem box has a great start as well, it seems as if there is a problem with the image, as I'm sure you already know, and there are a lot of characteristics of this compound present. Continue the search to find more about this chemical, but everything looks really good, you have a great page so far. Anbrown4 (talk) 01:44, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Peer Review: Ramin Amirsoltani

This page could definitely use some work with the picture as you already may know. Perhaps, you could elaborate the role of your chemical in the Krebs Cycle as you mentioned. Good use of the in text references, but I think you could add more content. One of your sections is spelled wrong, most specifically, occurrences!! I like the organization and the number of sources you have thus far. The organization and layout looks professional. The characteristics of your chemical is very sufficient, but just do some proofreading, fix the picture, and some more content, and you'll be good to go.

Amirsol2 (talk) 01:48, 2 November 2012 (UTC)