User talk:Mcgeelan

Welcome to Wikipedia. It was noticed that you deleted content on the Susan Bitter Smith article without giving an explanation.

Please familiarize yourself with the rules and practices of Wikipedia editing.

When you delete, add or edit content on any Wikipedia article, you must provide a summary/explanation of your edit.

Thanks, and happy editing. Xavier Lehtinen (talk) 17:30, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Help me!
Please help me with...https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Bitter_Smith The living person finds this page biased and offensive, and wishes to have it removed.

Mcgeelan (talk) 02:42, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 * While I share similar concerns about how much "weight" is being put on the controversy, unfortunately the controversy provides the few independent references that the article had. I will probably list the article at the biographies of living people noticeboard. --I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message. $(talk to me) (My edits)$ @  05:26, 21 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Mcgeelan, a person not liking certain content on their Wikipedia article isn't a valid reason for deleting it. Also, it seems that you've communicated with Susan Bitter Smith, which means you are connected to the subject. This constitutes a Conflict of Interest, meaning you should refrain from editing the page. I know it is frustrating, but just Google her name. Then click News. Every result on page one is about the complaints against her. I haven't seen any editors here make an argument as to why that content should not be included more in-depth on her Wikipedia article. Of course every politician (and person) would want their Wikipedia article to promote all the good things they'e done. But that's not what Wikipedia is. I'm pinging so he/she can weigh in further if desired. Thanks, Xavier Lehtinen (talk) 22:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
 * It looks like has done his or her, more than I did, as much I'm embarrassed to say that. It's best if you pay attention to Xavier. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding  to your message. $(talk to me) (My edits)$ @  01:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Susan Bitter Smith has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:49, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Susan Bitter Smith was changed by Mcgeelan (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.890905 on 2015-11-25T03:49:21+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Susan Bitter Smith, you may be blocked from editing. Stop removing sourced material from this article. As a WP:COI editor you should discuss any changes on the talk page. Meters (talk) 04:01, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Susan Bitter Smith. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Meters (talk) 22:43, 26 November 2015 (UTC)