User talk:Mchapra

March 2022
Hello, I'm Tunakanski. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Elden Ring have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. ― Tuna + 16:45, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm 97.113.161.27. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Michael Pocalyko, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Social media sources have very limited use. They cannot support such a serious claim.'' 97.113.161.27 (talk) 19:49, 12 March 2023 (UTC)


 * go fuck yourself Mchapra (talk) 19:51, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I'll just leave these here: WP:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gender and sexuality, WP:Requests for arbitration/Editing of Biographies of Living Persons, WP:Contentious topics. —Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 19:53, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
 * what part of go fuck yourself do you not understand? go fuck yourself. Mchapra (talk) 19:53, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 97.113.161.27 (talk) 19:54, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * dont care. go fuck yourself. Mchapra (talk) 19:55, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 20:04, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  20:25, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
— Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 16:14, 14 March 2023 (UTC)