User talk:McheePB

July 2020
Hello, I'm LakesideMiners. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Police Bank have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia.    LakesideMiners Come Talk To Me! 21:37, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello McheePB. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Police Bank, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:McheePB. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Naypta ☺ &#124; ✉ talk page &#124; 21:45, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Police Bank, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that.  I would also like to ask you to read Wikipedia's policy on marking edits as "minor", which you can find at WP:ME Blablubbs (talk) 21:45, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Police Bank, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:McheePB, and the template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Naypta ☺ &#124; ✉ talk page &#124; 21:49, 1 July 2020 (UTC)