User talk:Mckzck

(American Conservative Party)
The article American Conservative Party has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:27, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Please leave this line alone (Hello)
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. --Jerzy•t 23:21, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Massillon
Thanks for showing an interest in the article Massillon, Ohio, but i'm reverting your contribs on it, without prejudice toward inclusion of some of the content in different form; i had different reasons in different cases. _ _ My largest removal was of the Government section. For a community of under 35,000, you've listed over 30 public officials. It may be valuable to you to study WP:Notability, but i suggest that first you look over our treatment of public officials in our articles on an essentially random group of somewhat larger ones. (They are the 10 smallest places (in the 50 states) that are larger than 50K population, from |US-13S&-CONTEXT=gct United States -- Places and (in selected states) County Subdivisions with 50,000 or More Population...) I've looked at (at most) 1 of the corresponding articles, but i'm confident from long WP experience that you'll get from them what one tends to call "a sobering perspective" on the wider significance of public service at the local level; my gut sense of it is that the four positions whose use is specified under "Government type, Leaders" at Template:Infobox_settlement should suffice probably for anything smaller than the 200k-500k range. Check out these:
 * Milford city (balance - i.e. less Woodmont, Connecticut and Devon, Connecticut), CT
 * Cupertino city, CA
 * Florissant city, MO
 * Piscataway township, Middlesex County, NJ
 * Macomb township, Macomb County, MI
 * Maple Grove city, MN
 * Mentor city, OH
 * Bowie city, MD
 * Aspen Hill CDP, MD
 * Renton city, WA

_ _ I also unlinked the name of the mayor. While the fact is often ignored (by those who create them, and those whose priorities lie elsewhere at a given time), a red link should be regarded as an invitation to create an article at the title linked to; there's nothing wrong with erring on the side of linking where doubt exists, but others who expect that no such article could survive an AfD nomination on the grounds non-notability are right to unlink. The most efficient and effective counter to such link removals is writing the article, at least at the level of a persuasive Stub. _ _ Your change of the "founding" date sounds like a distinction between existence of a place where people settle and raise families bcz others are already living there, and legal incorporation. If it's that simple (and you probably know that tho i don't), a notation like
 * Founding; incorporation
 * 1812; 1826

is probably better than either what you found or left. _ _ Finally, i really am at a loss as to why you would replace the pop'n est. with an older one. Tho a ref supporting one and contradicting the other is the gold standard, the good faith of the previous editor is presumed, and we can't discard a plausible later estimate, even with documentation for the old one, without demonstrating the falsehood of the first one provided. Thanks again for your willingness to contribute to WP. --Jerzy•t 06:29, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

November 2010
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Ohio gubernatorial election, 2010 worked, but it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Tytrain (talk) 04:29, 26 November 2010 (UTC)