User talk:Mclarid1

Please stop adding the "reverse blaze" photo to the article horse markings. For one thing, it is an atypical marking and is not appropriate for an article about the standard set of markings. For another, wikipedia operates on a model of consensus and verifiability and this is simply an oddity of nature, not a typical horse marking. You may want to look at the article tovero or overo and see if there is an appropriate place to put that image in one of those articles, where it would be more suitable. If you wish to discuss the matter, you are certainly welcome to do so, either here or on the talk page of the article in question. Montanabw (talk) 04:08, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Image...
Please do not add the picture again to Horse markings. I've never seen a reliable source that discusses a name for such a marking, which you would need to describe it. Ealdgyth - Talk 01:33, 12 September 2009 (UTC)