User talk:Mcnary1948

Kalandia the refugee camp is not synonymous with Kalandia the village. The refugee camp is considered part of Jerusalem district. I refer you to the UNRWA entry on the camp "The Israeli authorities consider this area as part of Greater Jerusalem, and the camp was thus excluded from the redeployment phase in 1995. Kalandia camp remains under Israeli control today." http://www.unrwa.org/etemplate.php?id=119 IF Kalandia was on the Israeli barrier then it COULDN'T be in area "A". Nor is the area abandoned. Satellite photos clearly confirm this http://www.ochaopt.org/documents/opt_campprof_unrwa_qalandia_oct_2008.pdf You offer no refutation of the UNRWA report and I can only conclude you are doing this for political reasons. If you do not stop, then you will be reported and your IP will be banned. Wikipedia is for information not political agendas. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michardav (talk • contribs) 00:27, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Kalandia
Wikipedia IS a place where you have to refute. A google map of the area is not enough and it violates Wikipedia's verifiability rules in that it counts as "original research". "Wikipedia does not publish original research. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of its editors." You BELIEVE the picture shows an abandoned site- you have no verifiable proof. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CHALLENGE#Burden_of_evidence Plus if you look at the map, directly to the east of the airport you can see the football field mentioned in http://www.ochaopt.org/documents/opt_campprof_unrwa_qalandia_oct_2008.pdf I didn't threaten you, I merely posted facts. You can not post an aerial photogpraph and say that refutes Save the Children who in 2010 mention the Qalandia camp http://www.savethechildren.org.uk/sites/default/files/docs/OPT_PNA_CRC_Report_English_1.pdf and URWA. In fact your claim is refuted in a sub heading on the same page- Jerusalem governorate lists the camp as being Israeli controlled. So based on all these facts, what do YOU think an editor will say? Once again, the camp IS NOT ABANDONED. And you have NO source saying that the population moved, which again would contradict both UNRWA and save the children. Here's another page from the Kalandia camp's Handicraft cooperative. Note: "The Vocational Training Unit

1- Empowering eighty (80) Palestinian women from the central area of the West Bank and Jerusalem funded by the Arab Economic and Social Fund: The project initiated in June of 2009 and will go on until March of 2011. With an investment of 70K Kuwaiti Dinars, the first phase trainees are from the areas of Kalandia Refugee Camp" http://www.qalandia.org/projectinclude.htm And last but not least http://www.gofundme.com/Save-Qalandia-Summer-Camp a fund raiser form just LAST MONTH for kids at the Qalandia camp. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michardav (talk • contribs) 02:31, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

ARBIA warning
Details of these sanctions can be found by following the link in the information box at the top of Talk:Kalandia. They include a 1RR restriction that you have repeatedly violated at Kalandia. If you continue doing so, I will report you. Zerotalk 02:30, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Kalandia
Now is the time for you to stop disrupting the article Kalandia. You are not permitted to do your own satellite image analysis. If you don't stop, I will seek to have you blocked. Meanwhile, look where the refugee camp is marked on this map, or this map, or this map, or these maps, and see where UNRWA places the pin for Qalandia camp here. You are entirely wrong and you should give up. Zerotalk 09:05, 18 June 2013 (UTC)