User talk:Mcorningmyers/sandbox

Article Evaluation
Laura Mulvey

I chose to review [|Laura Mulvey's Wikipedia page].

I took issue with Mulvey's page for several reasons indicated below:
 * Superfluity: Unnecessary introduction of mostly unrelated film theorist Jean-Louis Baudry
 * Citations: Jean-Louis Baudry hyperlink leads to a blank page
 * Citations: Mulvey's predecessors have a serious lack of citations
 * Bad information placement: The Film Theory section heading contains large chunks concerning phallocentrism and patriarchy, while a section called Phallocentrism and Patriarchy exists directly underneath
 * Citations: Mulvey is noted to be a prominent avant-garde filmmaker, though little evidence is presented
 * Superfluity/Citations: There is an extrapolation concerning Mulvey's most influential film
 * Citations: List of films she co-directed lacks citations
 * Citations: Gaylyn Studlar hyperlinks leads to a blank page
 * Superfluity: Discussion of no-name academics who critiqued Mulvey, no citations to said critiques
 * Misinformation: Article states Mulvey's most recent book was published in 2006. She co-authored a book in 2017.
 * Superfluity: Much of Mulvey's article is used to poke holes in her Visual Pleasure Narrative instead of discussing Mulvey herself.
 * Quality: This article is rated as Start-Class. It is mostly incomplete.

--Mcorningmyers (talk) 05:11, 1 February 2018 (UTC)