User talk:McortNGHH

Welcome to Wikipedia from the Anatomy Wikiproject!
Welcome to Wikipedia from WikiProject Anatomy! We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of anatomy articles here on Wikipedia. One of our members has noticed that you are involved in editing anatomy articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing wikipedia articles are:
 * Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
 * You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing anatomy articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
 * We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
 * We write for a general audience. Every reader should be able to understand anatomical articles, so when possible please write in a simple form—most readers do not understand anatomical jargon. See this essay for more details.

Feel free to contact us on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. I wish you all the best on your wiki-voyages! Tom (LT) (talk) 23:27, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

A very interesting paper
Hi, McorthNGHH:

This paper may be useful to you (and is free access):

[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4809873/ Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Mar 29;10:130. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00130. eCollection 2016. Bread and Other Edible Agents of Mental Disease. Bressan P, Kramer P] PMID 27065833

Best regards. --BallenaBlanca (talk) 12:25, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks BallenaBlanca! Not only is it open access, it's available in ePub format so I can download it to my Kindle. It looks like it will be a great introduction to the topic. I am interested in the cytokine 'messengers' that carry systemic signals originating from inflammation. McortNGHH (talk) 08:10, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Error in image
Hi, McnortNGHH

This image has an error on paracellular route (transcellular route is repeated) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Selective_permeability_routes_in_epithelium.svg

I was trying to upload a new version, but I have problems with the extension. Can you do it?

Best regards. --BallenaBlanca (talk) 01:02, 20 August 2016 (UTC)


 * No problem BallenaBlanca. I also would like to separate the two cells demarking the paracellular route by a small amount and put the red arrow behind so it can show through the gap a bit. That way it well be evident that the route is between cells. For this I'll need the original image of the cells, etc. Is that SGV somewhere on Wikimedia? In any case, glad to help out. Otherwise, I'm not contributing too much this summer but expect to be 'back at it' next month... Cheers, McortNGHH (talk) 09:08, 20 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I have the original image, but it is not SGV format, is .png format, which I could not upload to replace the previous version.


 * I do not think it's right to separate the cells. In the graphs, cells are separated only when there is an increased intestinal permeability. It should be clear that in an intestine with intact barrier, the cells are attached.


 * Best regards. --BallenaBlanca (talk) 18:20, 21 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Oh! I just seen that you uploaded yesterday a new version of the image, but I'm afraid there has been an error, the label has not changed.... Take a look: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e9/Selective_permeability_routes_in_epithelium.svg --BallenaBlanca (talk) 18:25, 21 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Worry no more, we can use this: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Selective_permeability_routes_in_epithelium.png Best regards. --BallenaBlanca (talk) 18:28, 21 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Fixed ;-)  Best regards. --BallenaBlanca (talk) 18:39, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
 * And, BallenaBlanca, the SVG (corrected) ended up here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Selective_permeability_routes_in_epithelium.svg I don't know why or how that happened. In any case the label is fixed. McortNGHH (talk) 20:03, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I was watching the uncorrected version when clicking the link... and now I can see the updated version, after refreshing the page. Strange behaviors of computer... Thank you very much for your effort! Best regards.

Reference errors on 23 October
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Adenylylation page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=745793438 your edit] caused a cite error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F745793438%7CAdenylylation%5D%5D Ask for help])

Cram101
You added a reference to Cram101 to Mucosal immunology. Cram101 copies Wikipedia articles and paraphrases them, so shouldn't be used - it's using Wikipedia to cite itself. I've removed the reference. Fences &amp;  Windows  18:01, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Fences and windows. I'll be more careful with those types of citations from now on. It's an odd ecosystem we work within. McortNGHH (talk) 08:56, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Great. It can be hard to work out what is reliable and what is not. The essay WP:PUS gives some advice. Fences  &amp;  Windows  10:53, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Bifidobacterium animalis
Hey, thanks for your edits on the article! It's great to see some constructive and helpful edits when patrolling for vandalism. I imagine the main reason why your edit was flagged as potential vandalism by the bot was because of the line break that I reversed here. If you always preview your edits before submitting them it makes it glaringly obvious when making a silly formatting mistake. :) Thanks again for your editing, give me a shout if you need anything. Best, Nicnote  •  ask me a question  •  contributions  21:31, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

 * please help translate this message into your local language via meta

Thanks again :-) --  Doc James  along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 18:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

/Intestinal mucosal barrier listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect /Intestinal mucosal barrier. Since you had some involvement with the /Intestinal mucosal barrier redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:56, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Inactive WikiProject Anatomy participant
Hi McortNGHH, you're receiving this message because you were previously listed at WikiProject Anatomy as a participant, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 years.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the participant list, so that we stop spamming you with newsletters and have a better idea of who to contact for active discussions. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting here when you become active again.

Thank you, and all the best on your WikiVoyages! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 18:00, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

IP block exempt
I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking&#32;for a period of 6 months. If you still need an IP block exemption after it expires please file a new request. This will allow you to edit the English Wikipedia through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions. Inappropriate usage of this user right may result in revocation. I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. DatGuyTalkContribs 17:37, 30 January 2024 (UTC)