User talk:Mcpetjstn

Welcome!
Hello, Mcpetjstn, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Danish American Archive and Library, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Fram (talk) 14:25, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Danish American Archive and Library


A tag has been placed on Danish American Archive and Library requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://danishamericanarchive.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/July-2011.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 14:25, 23 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The article (Danish American Archive and Library) was created by and for that organization, a fact that can easily be verified by contacting their office in Blair, Nebraska (details available if desired). You cite a document from which significant parts of the article was taken. The DAAL has the copyright for that article. It seems a strange concept that one can violate one's own copyright. Mcpetjstn (talk) 15:51, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
 * First, please see WP:PAID / WPCOI, and also WP:NPOV. Articles aren't created for or by organisations, they are created by independent editors based on independent sources. Second, as long as the organisation doesn't publicly release these texts with a compatible license for Wikipedia ( CC BY-SA 3.0 or similar), they can't be used anyway, no matter your relation to the organisation and whether they have given you permission or not. Fram (talk) 16:02, 23 January 2023 (UTC)