User talk:Mcramer2017/sandbox

Savannah's Peer Review
Hello,

Try to compile more data on the diet and i do not think it fits in under the "life history" category well. The "interaction with Humans" is straight forward and unbiased while citing specific examples. The lead paragraph seems a little weak. Maybe more information about the 2 subspecies, or something about the size to pull the entire article together in the first paragraph. The last sentence under the "description" category is slightly confusing. Also, the sentence starts with "and" which is unnecessary.

Hope at least some of this was helpful!

Ssummers

Mathias's Peer Review Response
Good Morning Savannah,

I think you may have reviewed the original Wikipedia article, as opposed to my draft, because most of your comments refer to material which I edited in my draft (which can be found on my Sandbox). Nonetheless, thank you very much for your review! The fact that you have supported the very same changes that I implemented (e.g. separating dietary information into it's own section, providing more information on the 2 separate subspecies, and heavily editing and re-roganizing the lead section and entire article, etc.) is incredibly helpful in this article's development.

If you would like to see my changes please refer to the lower sections of my Sandbox.

Once again, thank you!

Best, Mcramer2017 (talk) 16:42, 4 March 2018 (UTC)mcramer2017