User talk:Mcsony

User:ErrantX/Sandbox/Surplus_women <- draft --Errant (chat!) 11:25, 16 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Heya. Sorry yesterday I was indisposed :) It was a great session - hopefully will see you at some of the monthly London wikimeets in the future! I'm not really sure what needs working on next - that book should be arriving today, so I might be able to do some work later. I think just picking a portion and working on it could work. Whatever interests you! :) --Errant (chat!) 08:23, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

=

"old hard drives"
Haha, love it :) How's everything going? I keep meaning to revisit Surplus Women, but every time I sit down with the book something happens! --Errant (chat!) 13:08, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Things going well - same here though, never find time to do all the things I want to do :( Just saw this... finally we have the data to show the ratio problem was really bad for 20-40 year old women in 1921, which makes the surplus women issue after the war very real, in contrast to the moral panic of the preceding era. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-18854073 Mcsony (talk) 18:14, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Gerard Lyons
Hi Mcsony, I've reviewed your DYK nomination and there are a few issues. Please reply at the nom. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:59, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Gerard Lyons
Hi. Can you comment on Template:Did you know nominations/Gerard Lyons so the review can be moved along? Thanks! --LauraHale (talk) 03:25, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

ooops
Sorry forgot to reply; doesn't look like you will get that one passed - their right, the sourcing/connection isn't the strongest. I'd be inclined to let it go and chalk it up to experience. :) --Errant (chat!) 08:11, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

DX7
You'll need much better sources to make the claim about how hard the DX7 was to program, especially being "notoriously" difficult or difficult to perform live. Nobody programmed the synth live! Rather, they worked on their patch programming in private, without the audience watching. During a live show they would call up their saved patches. Binksternet (talk) 21:22, 3 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Crossed messages with your talk page. DX7 was notoriously difficult to program, hence the whole secondary industry in the manuals. Partly because of the crappy buttons, partly because of the paradigm shift. You can be nice and say I need better sources, and I agree. But telling me I'm just plain wrong and being patronising is hardly helping encourage a more junior wikipedia contributor. Anyway, maybe we got off on the wrong foot. I think we both are trying to achieve the same thing. :) I was about to award you a special synth barnstar but seeing this comment kinda made me change my mind a little. Mcsony (talk) 21:30, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Changed my mind again.... you are forcing me to actually do my homework..... damn you wikipedia... ;)  Mcsony (talk) 21:41, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry about assuming the PDF was a user manual! The title and the fact that it was a PDF made me jump to the wrong conclusion. The PDF is a scan of Keyboard magazine, so it's perfectly legit. Regarding your idea, I took your source and I looked at books available online, and I came up with this little paragraph about difficulty. What do you think? Binksternet (talk) 03:51, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Awesome!!! That is much more balanced than what I was writing, and gets into the specifics of why it was difficult to program. I think that's a huge improvement on what I was writing. Also, I like how it gets to the very heart of the reason why the DX7 is very difficult at first but is worth mastering. Thanks Mcsony (talk) 22:24, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Timeline of world economy
Template:Timeline of world economy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 17:55, 2 June 2023 (UTC)