User talk:Mcveaga1

March 2017
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Mae Beavers, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 05:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Mae Beavers, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 05:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Conflict of interest notice
Hello, Mcveaga1. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Mae Beavers, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 06:12, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Removal of reliably sourced content
The Tennessean is a reliable source of information. Your removal claiming "defamatory and hateful content" is not an acceptable reason to remove content which is sourced by The Tennessean. If you disagree, please discuss on talk:Mae Beavers per wp:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. Continued removal would be considered wp:edit warring (I am restoring properly sourced content) and may result in a wp:block Jim1138 (talk) 06:21, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Mae Beavers, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 06:21, 24 March 2017 (UTC)