User talk:Mcwright1981/Empty World

Lead Guiding questions: •	Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes, there is a slight change in the lead. •	Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes, there is a concise introduction to the article’s topic. •	Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes, there is article section with an info box. •	Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No. •	Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? The lead is concise, perhaps a bit more detail on book’s themes or questions it raises.

Content Guiding questions: •	Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes. •	Is the content added up-to-date? Yes. •	Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No •	Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? No to both questions.

Tone and Balance Guiding questions: •	Is the content added neutral? Yes, it has it steady pace. •	Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? As mentioned by previous reviewer, avoiding subjective words would be ideal. •	Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No, it’s mostly well-rounded •	Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No.

Sources and References Guiding questions: •	Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes. •	Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.) Yes. •	Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes. •	Are the sources current? Yes. •	Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? No to both. •	Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.) •	Check a few links. Do they work? Yes, to all.

Organization Guiding questions: •	Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? •	Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? •	Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media •	Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes, 2 in total. •	Are images well-captioned? •	Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes •	Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Yes. •	How can the content added be improved? Yes, it can use more content.