User talk:Mcwright1981/Empty World/Fabiolabaeza465 Peer Review

Peer Review
Guiding questions: •          Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes, there is a slight change in the lead. •          Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes, there is a concise introduction to the article’s topic. •          Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes, there is article section with an info box. •          Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No. •          Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Yes, it's concise

Content Guiding questions: •          Is the content added relevant to the topic? Somewhat. •          Is the content added up-to-date? Somewhat. •          Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No •          Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? No to both questions.

Tone and Balance •          Is the content added neutral? Yes. •          Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No. •          Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Neither, it's mostly neutral. •          Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No.

Guiding questions: •          Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes. •          Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.) Yes. •          Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes. •          Are the sources current? Yes. •          Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? No to both. •          Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.) •          Check a few links. Do they work? There's only one, it works. Organization Guiding questions: •          Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? It could use some brushing up. •          Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? •          Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? The picture added is visually pleasing. Images and Media Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media •          Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes. •          Are images well-captioned? •          Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes •          Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Yes. •          How can the content added be improved? Yes, it can use more articles and sources.