User talk:Mdabdulhalimrafi

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shanta Holdings (October 10)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shanta Holdings and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Shanta_Holdings Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Curb_Safe_Charmer&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Shanta_Holdings reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:57, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Hello Mdabdulhalimrafi. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Shanta Holdings, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mdabdulhalimrafi. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:59, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ponyo bons mots 18:26, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅ to .-- Ponyo bons mots 18:26, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi @Ponyo, I understand about the disclosure. I am not being paid for creating this page.
 * And, if there is need any disclosure about the paid statement, I have no problem providing with that. My current concern is as soon as possible to publish the page, and make happy my boss. The disclosure segment can be like this:
 * Mdabdulhalimrafi (talk) 05:16, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
 * You are blocked for abusing multiple accounts. Please feel free to tell your boss that Wikipedia is not a platform for publishing marketing material on behalf of a company.-- Ponyo bons mots 20:29, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
 * But, this is my only account. I don't have any multiple accounts. How did I make the abuse, if you kindly let me know it will really help me out. Thanks Mdabdulhalimrafi (talk) 05:37, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Can you please help me unblocking my user account, please? Mdabdulhalimrafi (talk) 15:57, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
 * @Ponyo Mdabdulhalimrafi (talk) 16:36, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * The process for requesting an unblock are detailed in the block message.-- Ponyo bons mots 16:49, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Mdabdulhalimrafi (talk) 06:41, 7 December 2022 (UTC)