User talk:Mdann52/Archive 34

October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive
(t &#183; c)  buidhe  21:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: January 2023
--evrik (talk) January 16, 2023

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:AMAG logo new.jpg


The file File:AMAG logo new.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused, superseded by File:AMAG Austria Metall logo.svg."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 10:50, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: March 2023
--evrik (talk) March 16, 2023

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:49, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Need help
Hello! I have a question that can any user/admin see how many pages he/she deleted? I will be happy that if you know the answer. Thanks! Salazarov (chat) 19:48, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol needs your help!
Hello , The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.

Reminders:
 * There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
 * Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Sent by using  at 06:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: July 2023
-- (talk)

Sent by using  at 16:41, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol newsletter
Hello ,

Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!

October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.

PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.

Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.

Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.

Reminders:
 * You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
 * Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

November Articles for creation backlog drive
 Hello Mdann52:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!

The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

User:Mdann52/PermissionOTRS.js
Hello,

Please wrap the content of User:Mdann52/PermissionOTRS.js with  tags, as otherwise the content is parsed and the page is added to Category:Pages with templates in the wrong namespace. Thanks! ~ Eejit43 ( talk ) 13:55, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024
Hello ,

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:
 * You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
 * Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:26, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost/2024-06-08/Special report
I wrote this for the next Signpost piece. Anything I got wrong? Anything I should add? &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 00:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Nope, looks good to me! I'm planning to add Erratum support over the weekend (flagging up "correction" flags in the crossref database), but don't include this for now to keep the pressure off! Mdann52 (talk) 05:50, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted
Hi Mdann52, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:


 * Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
 * If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
 * If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! –&#8239;Joe (talk) 13:36, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Gloucester Cheese Rolling
Hello,

I saw you edited the past winner section of this wikipedia article. However, I think it's cooler the wikipedia page shows the flags of the winners, that way it's nice to see people from other countries who've won it.

Thanks in advance for eventually re changing this 178.51.60.97 (talk) 07:41, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Hey - thanks for reaching out! Just to clarify, however, Wikipedia prefers not using flags under such circumstances as the competetors are not representing a country - MOS:FLAG is the guidelines on this, hence their removal. thanks for your interest however! Mdann52 (talk) 08:06, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Clarification regarding closed poll
Thank you for closing the discussion regarding the political position of the GOP. However, I would like you to clarify your comment regarding the "ranges of believes": do you mean that the position should simply be "right-wing" without mentioning that parts of the party are centre-right and far-right, or did you mean something else with that?

Cortador (talk) 20:50, 6 June 2024 (UTC)


 * @Cortador that's exactly what I meant - I can clarify that bit in my statement if it didn't quite come across as that! Mdann52 (talk) 20:52, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
 * That would be helpful. Thank you again. Cortador (talk) 20:57, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Thinking about clarification in that close, you note "as stated in and supported by reliable sources...as long as backed up by the relevant sources". Does that mean you find consensus in the discussion that the sources do back it up, or are you merely reminding everyone of the general applicability of WP:RS/WP:BURDEN? DMacks (talk) 18:05, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
 * - I don't recall any mention of sources in that discussion, so I haven't considered them, and hence that caveat. If there had been discussion of sourcing, I would have worded it more like "as backed up by the sources cited below" or similar, but there was no discussion of sources so I deemed that appropriate for another discussion (and that represented the consensus from those who !voted). Regardless, I don't think it would be correct in that sort of discussion for a closer to unilaterally decide what sources were reliable or not. So yes, it was just a reminder of "this RfC doesn't trump WP:V". Mdann52 (talk) 18:12, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks. DMacks (talk) 18:15, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Hopefully this does the trick?
Hiya! First of all thanks for your comments on the Grand Cadaver draft. It surely improved it a lot! I have updated it with more sources, but before I resubmit it could you take a look at it? I don't know how strictly the "If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted." rule is applied, hence I want to be cautious! The Space Stout (talk) 15:23, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
 * don't worry about that warning too much - that's more for the blatent cases where articles don't meet the standards we have or where they are obviously promoting something! I'll have a better look later this evening, but I'd recommend trying to remove and replace the sources to www.metal-archives.com - it looks user-generated, so isn't really considered reliable. Just thinking aloud here - do you know if there's any additional coverage/reviews/attention in Sweedish sources at all? You can include non-English sources to meet our guidelines! Especially if they show they meet any of the criteria at WP:BAND. Mdann52 (talk) 15:34, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I see. In general the www.metal-arcives.com is usually the go-to place for the metal community, but yes, you are right that it is user-generated, and I'm unaware whether there is some kind of review process before publishing. In any case, as I was using it solely as a reference to the other bands of the members I'll try to find other sources. Thanks for your help! The Space Stout (talk) 21:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Undid one of your reviews by mistake
Hi, I unreviewed Qeshm earthquake with a mis-click. Please feel free to mark it as reviewed again. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Review the sources for this article
Hello, can you review the sources of this article and confirm whether it is accepted or rejected Draft:Mohamed Aarab to User:Mdann52 DRsabire (talk) 13:02, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I've had a look through the sources via Google translate, unfortunately I don't think he quite meets the bar currently. Most of those sources aren't what we call "in depth" coverage, and for BAND, which are the rules an artist needs to meet to have an article. Sorry! Mdann52 (talk) 13:10, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Mr. Submarine revert
Hi Matt!

New to editing. Was wondering why you reverted the changes on my page creation?

Thanks. LucasMaple (talk) 17:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC)


 * @LucasMaple apologies, I was going to leave you a message, but seem to have forgot!
 * in short, it appears from the sources provided the company may not be notable enough for an organisation, as the sources provided didn't show the organisation had received significant coverage. Now, more success may exist and just weren't cited, so it may well be an article on the subject is possible.
 * Your First Article is a good page to take a read of, and especially for a page like this, I would recommend you create it as a draft to allow you space to work on it, collect sources and get feedback before creating it, to prevent this sort of thing. Hope this helps! Mdann52 (talk) 18:41, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

New article
Hello, I have created a new article with the addition of various sources in English and French. You can take a look, review it, verify it, and accept or reject it. Draft:Draganov (musician) to User:Mdann52 DRsabire (talk) 14:32, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
 * looks like someone beat me to it! Mdann52 (talk) 05:58, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

A goat for you!
Hope you keep helping the newcomers like me.

JojoeditsWiki (talk) 00:05, 29 June 2024 (UTC) 