User talk:Mdcorcoran

Pranic healing
Hi, I rolled back your edits on the Pranic healing article to the last revision before your first one, due to the promotional tone and non-adherence to our medical article standards introduced by your edits. Before putting anything back in to the article I suggest discussing it on the talk page. We have stricter standards for medical related articles than most other types. See MEDRS for more details. Thanks! Chuy1530 (talk) 20:46, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello Thank you for your input. Even if Pranic Healing doesn't meet your medical standards (however there is more and more peer reviewed evidence) it should still be represented as spiritual and esoteric teachings with the proper name and list of works as that is cold hard fact that this person existed and produced books, courses and cds. Whether these methods work or not is irrelevant. If I create a page with the authors name and works will that be accepted? Also, there are parts of the Pranic Healing definition you have posted that are inaccurate. The posting should have the founders name down correctly and an accurate description of what it "claims" to be. This description is wrong whether the claim is true or not. Please advise me on how to proceed. Thank you Mdcorcoran (talk) 16:09, 16 December 2015 (EST)
 * The best thing to do would be to post on the article's talk page with what you think needs changed so that everybody can evaluate the changes and we can all agree on what the article should look like. Whether or not an article on the founder of Pranic Healing would be appropriate I can't say since I don't know much about him, but Wikipedia does have pretty strict notability guidelines (N) that must be satisfied before we can maintain an article on a person, organization or anything else. I'm just a regular editor, not an admin or anything, so feel free to ask other experienced editors for their opinion as well. A bunch of helpful people hang out at Teahouse Chuy1530 (talk) 19:42, 17 December 2015 (UTC)