User talk:Mdd/Archive 1

Edits to the Category:Science
I've noticed several of your edits adding things to Category:Science, most of these are problematic, since social sciences belong in Category:Social science. They should not be in both parent and child categories. Thanks for helping out with the categories in general, but just be a bit careful when adding categories to large numbers of articles, as it is easy to overlook these things. &mdash; siro &chi;  o  23:40, Oct 5, 2004 (UTC)


 * Hello again, I've responded on Category talk:Science &mdash; siro  &chi;  o

Request for edit summary
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:


 * [[Image:Edit_Summary-2.png|Edit summary text box]]

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. – Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 21:46, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

Regarding Systems Theory
Thank you for your very intelligent arguments. I hope I gave sufficient reasons to keep at least part of the changes. The most important argument here is that Hartmann's work is unmistakably the first systematic presentation of a General Systems Theory and that Bertalanffy's work is obviously taken from him. Unfortunately to know this first hand it is necessary to read Hartmann's Ontology. Best Regards - Dr. Gabriel Gojon 06:30, 5 January 2006 (UTC)