User talk:Mdehrey

Welcome
Hello Mdehrey, and welcome to Wikipedia. I hope that you have enjoyed contributing and want to stick around. Here are some tips to help you get started: If you need any more information, plenty of help is available - check out Questions; ask your question here and attract help with the code ; or leave me a message on my talk page explaining your problem and I will help as best as I can. Again, welcome! strdst_grl (call me Stardust) 12:28, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Learn the basics by reading the introduction and taking the tutorial.
 * Remember to sign messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ) to automatically insert your username and the date.
 * Enjoy editing to improve articles, but try to leave an edit summary to explain what you are doing.
 * Create your first article using the Article Wizard to help avoid common mistakes, which may lead to article deletion.
 * Although you don't need to be familiar with all of Wikipedia's policies, try to keep to the core principles and basic guidelines.
 * When dealing with fellow Wikipedians, please remain polite, solve problems calmly, and remember that no-one is out to get you.
 * Get involved with the community by joining a WikiProject.
 * Make any test edits in the sandbox or click here and create a sandbox of your own.
 * If you are having difficulty, consider finding a mentor to give you more personal advice.
 * If in doubt, be bold. If you make a mistake, it can easily be reverted.

Articles for deletion nomination of Ruth Pat-Horenzcyk
I have nominated Ruth Pat-Horenzcyk, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Ruth Pat-Horenzcyk. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Herostratus (talk) 02:51, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

re Ruth Pat-Horenzcyk
This article reads like a resume, not an encyclopedic entry. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 10:59, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Hello Mdehrey. Thank you for contributing this article. In my opinion, this person does not meet our standard of notability for academics per WP:ACADEMIC. Therefore I have had to suggest that the article be deleted. If you wish may discuss this at Articles for deletion/Ruth Pat-Horenzcyk. Ms Pat-Horenzcyk does seem an accomplished person and I wish her well and hope that later in her career she does rate an article. Message me if you have any questions. Again, thank you for your work on the article, and welcome to Wikipedia; I am sorry that we probably cannot accept this article, but I look forward to your future work here on Wikipedia. Herostratus (talk) 02:58, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ruth Pat-Horenczyk


A tag has been placed on Ruth Pat-Horenczyk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.

It looks like you recreated the previous article with a slightly different spelling at the same time as the deletion discussion was ongoing. As such, I am fairly certain that the reasons for its deletion are still valid. Furthermore, the size of the article has remained almost unchanged from the time you created it. Rockphed (talk) 15:31, 6 August 2019 (UTC)