User talk:Mdero3/sandbox

Peer Review (Klong5)
The information present is neutral and well written. The citations are formatted correctly and I do not see any problems with it. This new edit is very substantial. A lot of information is thrown in that is relevant to the article. I would focus in on working on more edits to help improve the article further. There are some instances where proof-reading should be done, but these are minor fixes that can be done easily.

Anthony's Peer Review
1) User's edits to the article are non-biased and come from news cites that are non-biased.

2) Proper citations used for specific pages. Medical pages have the appropriate references. Look very neat.

3) Lots of information plus user's own edits are substantial and quotes are appropriate and cited properly.

4) Grammar is correct and sentence structure is formatted nicely. No big words that are confusing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anigr2 (talk • contribs) 17:17, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review Response
I am planning on using the comments above to make my article changes more ordered and more substantial. I will take the previous comments and make my article stronger, I will fix the grammar and make corrections to the article. I am looking for a photo to add to the article but I cannot get passed the copyrights. I will most likely edit another part of the article, some of the information was irrelevant to the actual article so they need to be deleted or edited.

Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia! We have compiled some guidance for new healthcare editors:
 * 1) Please keep the mission of Wikipedia in mind. We provide the public with accepted knowledge, working in a community.
 * 2) We do that by finding high quality secondary sources and summarizing what they say, giving WP:WEIGHT as they do.  Please do not try to build content by synthesizing content based on primary sources.  (For the difference between primary and secondary sources, see WP:MEDDEF.)
 * 3) Please use high-quality, recent, secondary sources for medical content (see WP:MEDRS). High-quality sources include review articles (which are not the same as peer-reviewed), position statements from nationally and internationally recognized bodies (like CDC, WHO, FDA), and major medical textbooks. Lower-quality sources are typically removed. Please beware of predatory publishers – check the publishers of articles (especially open source articles) at Beall's list.
 * 4) The ordering of sections typically follows the instructions at WP:MEDMOS. The section above the table of contents is called the WP:LEAD. It summarizes the body. Do not add anything to the lead that is not in the body. Style is covered in MEDMOS as well; we avoid the word "patient" for example.
 * 5) We don't use terms like "currently", "recently," "now", or "today". See WP:RELTIME.
 * 6) More generally see WP:MEDHOW, which gives great tips for editing about health -- for example, how to format citations quickly and easily.
 * 7) Reference tags generally go after punctuation, not before; there is no preceding space.
 * 8) We use very few capital letters and very little bolding. Only the first word of a heading is usually capitalized.
 * 9) Common terms are not usually wikilinked; nor are years, dates, or names of countries and major cities.
 * 10) Do not use URLs from your university library's internal net: the rest of the world cannot see them.
 * 11) Please include page numbers when referencing a book or long journal article.
 * 12) Please format citations consistently within an article and be sure to cite the PMID for journal articles and ISBN for books; see WP:MEDHOW for how to format citations.
 * 13) Never copy and paste from sources; we run detection software on new edits.
 * 14) Talk to us! Wikipedia works by collaboration at articles and user talkpages.

Once again, welcome, and thank you for joining us! Please share these guidelines with other new editors.

– the WikiProject Medicine team Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 09:51, 5 May 2018 (UTC)