User talk:Mdhennessey



'''So long as ignorance is given the same stature as scholarly research, Wikipedia stands no chance of ever being considered as a serious source of encyclopedic information. Two scholars can engage in a legitimate discourse; a scholar and an imbecile cannot. If and when "I don't get it" no longer carries viable weight as a logical argument regardng article content, well, we'll see. Until that time, I will happily devote my energies to more productive pursuits.''' Mdhennessey (talk) 19:32, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Welcome back
I'm glad to see you're editing here again. You've been missed. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 05:30, 3 March 2008 (UTC) vdf ,ghdrmg emtyg ,gfmh  ,mf,hdgkdhjkyi,dl;gn../kglkhgkfgjd.lgm;lfm bf,ndlkfjlj n,fjsdlcl,dfgmfmkgjf gfgdf nghmgh,ggggggggggggnhlppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.10.112.243 (talk) 22:19, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Mission_San_Juan_Capistrano_bells.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:Mission_San_Juan_Capistrano_bells.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih (talk) 02:23, 24 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Mdhennessey - I've taken the liberty of adding a "GFDL" license to this image that you've identified as being self-created, in the belief that this was your intent in uploading the image. Wikipedia is an unprecedented combination of anarchy and bureaucracy. Sometimes it seems mostly chaotic, at other times too concerned with minor rules. Like a man with one foot in a pail of boiling water and the other in a block of ice, the individual cases are hard to accept even while the average is fine. Thanks for this and your many other contributions. Cheers, Will Beback NS (talk) 07:12, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Mission SJC Refectory.jpg
Hi Mdhennessey!

We thank you for uploading Image:Mission SJC Refectory.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation. This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 17:30, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

NowCommons: Image:Amsterdam CL-101.jpg
Image:Amsterdam CL-101.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:USS Amsterdam (CL-101) at Astoria, 14 October 1945.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:39, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * File:Mission San Diego de Alcalá in 1848.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Mission San Diego de Alcala in 1848.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 16:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Aristaeus ARB-1.jpg is now available as Commons:File:USS Aristaeus (ARB-1).jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 22:10, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Franciscan missionaries in California.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Franciscan missionaries in California.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:29, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Canyon of the Little Christians.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Canyon of the Little Christians.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:30, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Choir missals at Mission San Luis Rey.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Choir missals at Mission San Luis Rey.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:31, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
 * File:AO-58 Manatee - CV-41 Ticonderoga.jpg is now available as Commons:File:AO-58 Manatee - CV-41 Ticonderoga.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:05, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * File:AD-20 Hamul.jpg is now available as Commons:File:AD-20 Hamul.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:40, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
 * File:AD-21 Markab.jpg is now available as Commons:File:AD-21 Markab.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:46, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
 * File:AD-27 Yellowstone.jpg is now available as Commons:File:AD-27 Yellowstone.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:53, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:LSTs 794 796 843 and 1040.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:LSTs 794 796 843 and 1040.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --After Midnight 0001 01:21, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:LST-794.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:LST-794.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --After Midnight 0001 01:21, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:LST-794 beached.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:LST-794 beached.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --After Midnight 0001 01:22, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fighting Sullivans young.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Fighting Sullivans young.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.


 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.


 * If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.


 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 09:09, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fighting Sullivans.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Fighting Sullivans.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.


 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.


 * If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.


 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:41, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Tustin CA undated USNR blimp.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Tustin CA undated USNR blimp.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:55, 13 February 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 18:55, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:LST-1159 and LST-1167.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:LST-1159 and LST-1167.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gyrobo (talk) 16:45, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:United States Navy vehicle landing ships
Category:United States Navy vehicle landing ships, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 02:35, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

File:US Army new uniforms.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:US Army new uniforms.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 01:27, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:T-AGDS-2 Point Loma.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:T-AGDS-2 Point Loma.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:33, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:APA-33 and LSM-59.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:APA-33 and LSM-59.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — Huntster (t @ c) 05:55, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Fighting Sullivans.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Fighting Sullivans.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:47, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

File:LSMR-409.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:LSMR-409.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 15:11, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

File:LSMR-409.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:LSMR-409.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

File:LSMR-409.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:LSMR-409.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Westpac Express HSV-4676.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Westpac Express HSV-4676.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Logan Talk Contributions 19:23, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Robert Lawrence Leopold and other articles for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the following articles to which you have significantly contributed, are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted:

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Edward Henry Allen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:08, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Frederick Curtice Davis for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frederick Curtice Davis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Frederick Curtice Davis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lettlerhello • contribs 17:46, 25 January 2021 (UTC)