User talk:Mdkaif7

July 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Aurangabad. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:10, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Raichur, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 12:12, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Aurangabad, you may be blocked from editing. Do not change sourced content and instructions, also do not add honorifics, Aurangzeb is the WP:COMMONNAME. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:26, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Hi Mdkaif7! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Aurangabad and Osmanabad that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 13:27, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Please do not remove instructions from the Wiki markup code in articles as you did at Aurangabad. It makes life difficult for other editors. -- Toddy1 (talk) 13:30, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

There is absolutely no sense in removing a statement from an article but leaving the citation for that statement. You did that in the articles on Aurangabad and Osmanabad. Please read Wikipedia:Citing sources. -- Toddy1 (talk) 13:30, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Aurangabad, you may be blocked from editing. It does not make any sense deleting a statement but leaving the citation for it. In addition, you marked your edit as a minor edit, which it was not. Minor edit has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit. -- Toddy1 (talk) 15:18, 1 August 2022 (UTC)