User talk:Mdsjm

Speedy deletion nomination of Ernesto P. Molmenti, MD, PhD, MBA (Physician)


A tag has been placed on Ernesto P. Molmenti, MD, PhD, MBA (Physician), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Plandu (talk) 02:21, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Ernesto Pompeo Molmenti
I have moved the article you were working on from The article is ready to be published. I don't have conflict of interests.Please if there is a need to make some modification suggest exactly what should be done. Thanks. to Draft:Ernesto Pompeo Molmenti. In addition to the erroneous page title, the content and tone of the article are unacceptably promotional. The draft needs a complete rewrite before it can be accepted as an article. Regards, -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:10, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Multiple accounts
Also, in light of an identical page created by User:Williamsr82, please be aware that Wikipedia policy does not, in general, permit the simultaneous use of multiple accounts. Details can be found at Sock puppetry. Regards, -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:14, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ernesto Pompeo Molmenti


A tag has been placed on Draft:Ernesto Pompeo Molmenti, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Praxidicae (talk) 17:44, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Ernesto Pompeo Molmenti has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ernesto Pompeo Molmenti. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:56, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Does the author of this draft have any sort of financial or other connection with the subject of this draft? Please read the conflict of interest policy and the paid editing policy and make any required declarations.

You may ask for advice about conflict of interest at the Teahouse.

If this draft is resubmitted without addressing the question about conflict of interest, it may be Rejected or nominated for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:56, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ernesto Pompeo Molmenti (December 6)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Praxidicae was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ernesto Pompeo Molmenti and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ernesto Pompeo Molmenti, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ernesto_Pompeo_Molmenti Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Praxidicae&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ernesto_Pompeo_Molmenti reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 18:18, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Mdsjm. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Praxidicae (talk) 18:19, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ernesto Pompeo Molmenti


A tag has been placed on Ernesto Pompeo Molmenti, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Praxidicae (talk) 23:02, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020
Hello Mdsjm. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mdsjm. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. — Coffee //  have a ☕️ //  beans  // 23:47, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Coffee, thank you very much for your input. I completely understand the COI policy and I am aware that if you are paid directly/indirectly or if you are friend/relative or any similar you should not write the article and in the worse case scenario you must disclose that. In my case I don't receive any kind of benefit of any nature for writing this article, and I am not related in any way other than reading and studying the scientific and "Science-culture" work published by this author. I am absolutely open to delete whatever might even sound promotional. I tried to provide a reference for pretty much every single sentence, and again, I am open to delete whatever may sound for the general readers not appropriate for X or Y reason. I placed the article in review for about 2 months and I didn't receive any particular feedback. I will appreciate if you can point out what I should edit or I even invite you to make the edition you consider appropriate. Thank you very much!!!--Mdsjm (talk) 00:13, 22 January 2020 (UTC)