User talk:Mdutmers

I'm struggling to understand how the Riverfork_consulting wiki page is any different than any other business page. Please let me know. Thanks!

Speedy deletion nomination of Riverfork Consulting
A tag has been placed on Riverfork Consulting requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - Warthog Demon  15:59, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Riverfork Consulting
Hi there {BASEPAGENAME}! I saw that you added a {tl|hangon} tag to a page which you created, Riverfork Consulting. This is good, but in the process you removed the tag requesting deletion under CSD A7. Even though there is a hangon on the page, the deletion template should remain there. But don't worry, this doesn't mean that the page is going to get deleted. Make sure you edit the talk page of the page nominated for deletion, located at Talk:Riverfork Consulting, administrators will look at your reason why the page should remain before they make a decide what to do. Thanks - SDPatrolBot (talk) 16:37, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Page deleted
Sorry - I checked out your article and the company does not meet our WP:CORP standards, so I had no choice but to delete it. Sorry about that. Manning (talk) 17:26, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Will work on WP:Corp standards
Thanks Manning. I'll work on the notability. ; ) Best Regards.
 * Since you seem to work there, you should also look at WP:COI. - Warthog Demon  17:33, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:RiverFork Consulting logo.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading File:RiverFork Consulting logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 07:18, 2 August 2009 (UTC)