User talk:Me6481

ummm

April 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to List of generation VIII Pokémon, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 05:51, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to List of generation I Pokémon. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 06:19, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at List of generation VI Pokémon, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 02:46, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

I am so sorry i did not realise i had done such a thing but what type of items may i put in when i edit?Also how is descriptions of pokémon bad? Me6481 (talk) 07:49, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

I do not appreciate the way you talked to me so please do not talk to me that way again Me6481 (talk) 04:36, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

please don’t talk to me again Me6481 (talk) 06:09, 7 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Your user talk page is a place for other editors to communicate with you. If there are problems with your edits, and you are not willing to have editors tell you that, using standard messaging templates, then the only way we will be able to prevent further problems is to block you from editing. Please leave this line of communication open.- gadfium 06:23, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

ok i will sorry did not realise that thank you for telling me! Me6481 (talk) 06:25, 7 May 2020 (UTC) A tip for you is to add reliable sources. This will prevent you from ending up in the same situation again.JTZegers (talk) 19:58, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

My editing history
I put something on List of Pokémon VI and I don’t get why what i put on is bad.All i did was put descriptions of the pokemon on it and it was very informative.Im angry at wikipedia and the person who said it. Me6481 (talk) 07:57, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

The person was MaterialScientist and I am very angry at them.Boo MaterialScientist! Me6481 (talk) 04:33, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Have you followed the link in the first message and done the tutorial? If not, here it is again: Help:Introduction to referencing with Wiki Markup/1 Please run through this as it will do you a lot of good. There is a lot to learn about Wikipedia before you can make useful contributions. Referencing is top of the list.  Schwede 66  05:09, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

ok thanks Schwede66! Me6481 (talk) 05:13, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia Australian community
Hey I would just like to place in that if you have any concerns about some australian articles or article made by australians and you are australian then please post them here.Hopefully we can fix such problems and do some good things for Wikipedia’s Australian articles. Me6481 (talk) 05:04, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Project Sword and Shield
Please apply to help make a wikiproject here. Editors needed now! Me6481 (talk) 06:51, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Editors for a pokémon sword and shield article needed. Me6481 (talk) 00:18, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Please stop
If you're hoping to make friends on Wikipedia, as your user-page states, leaving messages on talk pages saying that established articles, including featured ones, should be deleted is definitely the wrong way to go about it. The only thing this behaviour is going to accomplish is annoying a lot of people; nobody is going to delete an article just because one new user doesn't like it. Some people worked very hard on those articles and they might become upset to see someone new come along and say all their work should be deleted. You really, really need to read Notability before continuing to edit Wikipedia further. Wikipedia has been around for 19 years, we have a clearly established process of how to define whether an article should exist, and you clearly do not understand it.

There's no reason to hate Materialscientist. I understand you put effort into an article, and that it's annoying when someone removes your work, but I would have done the exact same thing as Materialscientist, as I'm sure every other established editor on Wikipedia would have. The fact is this is an encyclopedia, it's supposed to be well-referenced and written in a particular way. While I appreciate that you want to help, I think you may be a bit too young to grasp how things are supposed to work here. I mean that in the nicest way possible. Writing an encyclopedia can be a tedious job and its quite bland at times; you'll probably have more fun and make more friends with a hobby more appropriate for your age. :) Damien Linnane (talk) 09:41, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

sOh I am so sorry I would love to fix my wrongs. I will change that right away Me6481 (talk) 00:15, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Please I would like you to tel me when you think I have written something rude. Me6481 (talk) 09:01, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

A suggested water-related project - Rangitata Diversion Race
Hi, if you are interested in contributing to improving the Wikipedia content about Water in New Zealand, I have a suggested project that you could undertake. It would involve creating a new article about the large irrigation scheme in mid-Canterbury known as the Rangitata Diversion Race (often abbreviated to RDR).

The RDR scheme definitely meets the Wikipedia criteria for notability because it is amongst the earliest and largest of major irrigation projects in New Zealand. The scheme is briefly mentioned in a couple of Wikipedia articles but with little detail. A dedicated article is justified. I have already prepared an initial reading list that provides useful reference sources about the RDR that can be cited in preparing this article. Here is a link to the list of references: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1oWI-pxlG6QmbV3qpME75oJf8qUfWIa-QLz5lSdJZSy0

Note that one important website about the RDR appears to be down as I write this, but hopefully it will come back online soon.

If you are interested in taking up this project, I recommend that you commence by first creating content in your Sandbox, or in a new page under your own username. To see what I mean about a new page under your username, have a look at this article under my username that I will be working on over the next few months.User:Marshelec/Power-System Protection. The great benefit of working on your initial article in your Sandbox or your own user namespace is that it doesn't automatically trigger review/action by other editors at a stage when this is not justified. You can wait until the article is reasonably well developed, and then move it into the main Wikipedia namespace. To create a new page under your name space just enter the proposed name into the search box. You will be presented with options that include creating the page of that name. For this proposed project, you would enter User:Me6481/Rangitata Diversion Race. I would be happy to work with you on this proposed new article.

There are lots of other topics in the Water area I could suggest if this one does not appeal. However, I have suggested this one because there are good references available, and this may allow you to create a useful article without too much difficulty. If this article is created, it can be linked to existing Wikipedia articles that mention the RDR, and it can be one of the subordinate articles of the new article that I propose to create on Irrigation in New Zealand. Marshelec (talk) 21:28, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

thank you but I was hoping to give ideas but not i plant them. You see I am only new and I wanted to help you add more but just don’t do it myself. I would still love to give ideas and I will certainly read that. Me6481 (talk) 00:17, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
 * OK, I hope that in time, you will feel confident in preparing a Wikipedia article on a topic that interests you. Remember that most new articles start at a very basic level. They don't have to be extensive, or have perfect written English at the early stages. Marshelec (talk) 00:56, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Of course, right after i’ve been on wiki for 13 years!hehehehehe Me6481 (talk) 07:44, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Ask Me!
Want to ask me a question? Well ask here! Just write what the topic of the question is then write the question! I will try to reply as as soon as possible. Thanks! Me6481 (talk) 09:00, 8 May 2020 (UTC)