User talk:MeNaagesh

I would request any user commenting on Prof Alf Hiltebeitel to read up the book and respond. I am providing a link for any Editor who is serious about right conclusions here.

http://books.google.co.in/books?id=uV-RrRoMzbgC&pg=PA470&lpg=PA470&dq=alf+hiltebeitel+agnikula+origin+myth&source=bl&ots=eEMdCVfb8u&sig=BjxMcuuPZkgobfCb8KprFH7St00&hl=en&sa=X&ei=A_wTUO-RHMbSrQe_gYHgCg&ved=0CE8Q6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=alf%20hiltebeitel%20agnikula%20origin%20myth&f=false

Kindly be very specific about your objections to suggestions and Prof. Alf Hiltebeitel's statements. Respond to each point in detail if objectivity is your concern. What is provided above is a mere glimpse. Reviewers are invited to rephrase and seek consensus on statements where needed from facts provided or further researched from the provided sources or other scholarly sources.

Else, serious concerns can be raised wiki articles.

Request for Very Specific Comment and Specific Rephrasing where Deemed Appropriate
I would request any user commenting on Prof Alf Hiltebeitel to read up the book and respond. I am providing a link for any Editor who is serious about right conclusions here.

http://books.google.co.in/books?id=uV-RrRoMzbgC&pg=PA470&lpg=PA470&dq=alf+hiltebeitel+agnikula+origin+myth&source=bl&ots=eEMdCVfb8u&sig=BjxMcuuPZkgobfCb8KprFH7St00&hl=en&sa=X&ei=A_wTUO-RHMbSrQe_gYHgCg&ved=0CE8Q6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=alf%20hiltebeitel%20agnikula%20origin%20myth&f=false

Kindly be very specific about your objections to suggestions and Prof. Alf Hiltebeitel's statements. Respond to each point in detail if objectivity is your concern. What is provided above is a mere glimpse. Reviewers are invited to rephrase and seek consensus on statements where needed from facts provided or further researched from the provided sources or other scholarly sources.

Else, serious concerns can be raised wiki articles.

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:19, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:21, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

"Evident bias"?
Hello, MeNaagesh. In light of your recent edits at Talk:Vanniyar, especially this one, I would ask that you please review WP:AGF, a longstanding Wikipedia guideline that serves us well when it is observed. The idea that I am in any way biased about Vanniyar, "a very large social group of people spread all across South India", might be laughable—considering I'd never even heard the word until recently—were it not offensive. You know nothing about me or my views, and it is asinine to suggest that you do. I explained why I reverted your edit and I stated clearly that I have no opinion on the changes you propose to make to the article, and that's as much as I intend to say on the talk page. If you'd like to become a Wikipedian in good standing, please refrain from voicing ignorant assumptions about your fellow contributors, use edit summaries, and sign your talk page posts. That's not too much to ask. In fact, it's expected of everyone who edits here. Rivertorch (talk) 05:37, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Naagesh
Hi naagesh ,

I am trying to add few comments to the page 'vanniyar' but the other user "Qwyrxian" always remove that. we need to do something for that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suryavarman01 (talk • contribs) 07:09, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

February 2014
Hi. Please stop posting personal attacks about users Sitush, Qwyrxian, Rivertorch or others, including unfounded accusations that they are the same person. No personal attacks and Assume good faith are policies here, please read them. Continuing such attacks may lead to a block. Conspiring off-wiki with others to "handle" your opponents or to seek people who agree with you for the purpose of coming to Wikipedia and supporting your side of a debate, as you do here, is a violation of policy, see WP:MEAT, and certainly will lead to a block if it's repeated. Users recruited in such a way may be treated as sockpuppets of you. Please post from one account at all times; going back and forth between your account and your IP is very confusing for other editors who try to make sense of Talk:Vanniyar, as is also your habit to (sometimes) sign your posts by hand as "IndianAnthro". Both these practices tend to give the impression of more support for your positions than actually exists, as it may look like you're (at least) three different people. Bishonen &#124; talk 14:20, 15 February 2014 (UTC).

Speedy deletion nomination of REDHAT SAFETY TRAINING & CONSULTING


A tag has been placed on REDHAT SAFETY TRAINING & CONSULTING requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 13:06, 25 June 2015 (UTC)