User talk:Meanmemescorrecting

July 2020
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Merely describing editing with which you disagree as "tampering" does not explain why you think that editing should be reverted. JBW (talk) 13:32, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.  Acroterion   (talk)   14:40, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * Stop putting the AN template into the article, and stop with the spurious accusations. You will be blocked if you do that again. I've notified JBW of the post at AN, which you neglected to do.JBW hasn't edited the article - you were warned because you were intserting commentary which was removed by another editor.   Acroterion   (talk)   14:53, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Partially blocking for Benjamin Harrison V
Sadly, you have once again edit warred and replaced the AN notice in the article. I will proceed to block you from editing that article. This is a WP:content dispute. Please feel free to withdraw your AN complaint and to discuss the article content at Talk:Benjamin Harrison V. Thanks -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 16:07, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

For some reason, instead of taking the advice to discuss the relevant issues on the talk page of the article, you decided to evade your block by editing without logging in. I have therefore increased the block to cover all pages apart from this one, rather than just the one article where you have caused problems. The article in question has already been protected for a while to prevent further block-evasion; please don't make it necessary to protect it for longer, as that is likely to cause inconvenience for legitimate editors. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by adding the text to the bottom of the talk page of your original account, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Any unblock request will be assessed by an independent administrator, but I advise you that you are very unlikely to be unblocked unless you make it clear that in future you will abide by all Wikipedia policies, including not evading blocks, and not edit-warring. JBW (talk) 13:42, 5 July 2020 (UTC)