User talk:Meatpuppett

March 2023
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Still life photography, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. CycloneYoris talk! 19:47, 12 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the input. What would be considered as a reliable source? Meatpuppett (talk) 19:50, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Sure. Go to Reliable sources, and there you can see a list of sources that are considered reliable. CycloneYoris talk! 19:52, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your help. Could you please guide me on how to report any unreliable sources? For instance, on the same page, someone cited a website that appears to be promoting ExpertPhotography. However, I could be mistaken and would like to learn more about checking links for reliability. Meatpuppett (talk) 19:55, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Hmmm I'm not sure. But you can also go to Verifiability and there someone will likely help you with that. Or you can try going to Teahouse where new editors go to when they need assistance.
 * I would also like to advise you to change your username, if you don't mind, as it resembles the policy against WP:MEATPUPPETry and it could possibly get you into trouble. You can request a change of username here: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. CycloneYoris talk! 20:09, 12 March 2023 (UTC)