User talk:Mecj2

August 2017
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Sofia Carson, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:58, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Sofia Carson. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ''You have already been warned on switching the column order in violation of WP:ACCESSIBILITY. Either discuss what changes you want made on the article's Talk page, or risk getting blocked.'' --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:19, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Last warning
Please discuss what you are trying to accomplish at these articles' Talk pages. If you continue the way you are going, you will be guilty of edit warring and will be subject to a block at that point. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 02:12, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Dylan Playfair for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dylan Playfair is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dylan Playfair until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 23:25, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Evolution Tour for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Evolution Tour is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Evolution Tour until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Finngall  talk  00:06, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 22:23, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Descendants 2, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:12, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Seriously, knock it off
Once again, you just edited Sofia Carson, ignoring WP:ACCESSIBILITY. If you don't understand how to do this properly, you seriously need to just stop stop editing Discography and related tables entirely. Consider this your very final warning – you have been warned about this repeatedly, and if you do this again, I can guarantee that one of us is going to seek to have you blocked on the grounds of Disruptive editing and/or Edit warring. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:23, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Stop editing pages without reliable sources!
On the pages of Know No Better (song) and Crying in the Club, both of which feature Camila Cabello, you've continuously added that OMG (Camila Cabello song) and Havana (Camila Cabello song) are official singles, even though you haven't added any sources to back up those claims. Also, on those two songs, "OMG" and "Havana", you have added the singles chronology for both artists involved, even though, you still have no sources to back up your claims.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Know No Better (song), Crying in the Club, OMG (Camila Cabello song) and Havana (Camila Cabello song) you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. RedSox39 (talk) 15:29, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Camila Cabello does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Peaceray (talk) 22:31, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sofia Carson. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:21, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Sofia Carson, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''And you continue with your disruptive editing at this article. Consider this your final warning.'' --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:39, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Sofia Carson, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:07, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Dove Cameron, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:11, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Go (McClain Sisters song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Single ([//toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Go_%28McClain_Sisters_song%29 check to confirm] | [//toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Go_%28McClain_Sisters_song%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Cameron Boyce. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 02:04, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Shawn Mendes discography.  Ss 112  00:13, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Cameron Boyce, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Philip J Fry : Talk  20:33, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 weeks for persistent disruption, refusal to discuss. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:28, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Brenna D'Amico for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brenna D'Amico is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Brenna D'Amico until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MPFitz1968 (talk) 17:29, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Brenna D'Amico


Hello, Mecj2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Brenna D'Amico".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:45, 9 May 2019 (UTC)