User talk:Meddlelol

May 2014
Hello, I'm Dwpaul. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Veronica Avluv without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!  Dwpaul  Talk   01:39, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Veronica Avluv, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.  Dwpaul  Talk   03:32, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Veronica Avluv, you may be blocked from editing.  Dwpaul  Talk   03:38, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

I explained my edits in the edit summary this time; don't change it back again. Meddlelol (talk) 03:47, 21 May 2014 (UTC)


 * You explained nothing of substance. The information you are removing is supported by a citation of a reliable source. The problem now is not the lack of a summary; it is that you are removing properly sourced content. I have no evidence that you have any direct connection to the content or its subject and thus no reason to accept your argument that it pertains to a "personal matter" (personal to whom?). There is a process to follow if you legitimately have some relationship to the subject and wish to pursue it. Let me know if you would like more information on it.  Please refrain from removing sourced content in the mean time.  Dwpaul   Talk   04:03, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Yes I legitimately have some relationship to the subject, give me the information I need please Meddlelol (talk) 04:09, 21 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Please see Biographies of living persons/Help which includes information on addressing any inaccuracies in information pertaining to living persons in Wikipedia articles.  Dwpaul  Talk   04:23, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Veronica Avluv.  Dwpaul  Talk   04:05, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Veronica Avluv shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. I am also warning the party you are edit warring with. Safiel (talk) 05:24, 21 May 2014 (UTC)