User talk:Medgeorgia

Georgian alphabet
Hi. Your [ recent activity] on the Georgian alphabet article is — whether you intended to do this or not — likely to be seen as a continuation of an edit war which another editor started waging a few days ago. If you honestly believe the material in question does not belong, regardless of the fact that it appears to be supported by reliable sources, then you need to participate in a discussion with other editors on the article's talk page and reach some sort of consensus before proceeding. It may very possibly end up being the case that this article should outline multiple, opposing views in keeping with the neutral point of view policy. But even if you are convinced that you are right, and everyone else is wrong, and that there is nothing to discuss, this is still not acceptable on Wikipedia as an excuse for edit warring. If you make any more attempts to impose this particular editing of the article without a general consensus to do so, you are likely to be blocked from editing in order to protect Wikipedia from damage by edit warring and other disruptive editing practices. — Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 23:51, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I do not think that the Armenians did the Georgian alphabet.
 * Now, I do not want to take part in any discussion.--Medgeorgia (talk) 16:29, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

AN/I
Please see this thread. J Milburn (talk) 23:52, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

arning
You have been edit-warring, inserting copy-and-pasted text in violation of copyrights, and used poor sources including circular ones ("books" that are themselves just Wikipedia mirrors) on the Georgian alphabet article, as well as engaged in repeated tendentious argument over it. If you continue editing in this vein, you will be blocked without further warning. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:46, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Please see
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Ե րևանցի talk  21:37, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Secret account 01:03, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Hint. Also read the stuff linked at the bottom of that essay. 79.255.213.251 (talk) 15:35, 30 November 2013 (UTC)


 * I don't understand you. You don't appear to be blocked at ka-wiki, and if you were, we couldn't do anything about it. Peridon (talk) 18:29, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I corrected the mistakes in the English Wikipedia about Georgians and others, But I was involved into the discussion with Armenians.

I myself am fighting against injustice and insults. Please unblock me due to the contribution in ka wikipedia.-- MEDGEORGIA  talk  18:39, 2 December 2013 (UTC)


 * OK, It seems you do not want to know the truth. It's good Continue to do so, write lies. It is a pity -- MEDGEORGIA  talk  19:18, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Ah. You're asking us to take your good contributions at ka-wiki into account. Unfortunately, I don't think many of the en-wiki admins can read Kartvelian languages - or Armenian either... I can tell that you haven't been blocked from editing there, but nothing else. Peridon (talk) 19:22, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
 * OK, Bro. I was trying to defend my language from Armenians, but I was angry because of the insolence of Armenians. Therefore I Blocked. Not bad, I will continue work on Kartvelian language in Georgian (ka) wiki. -- MEDGEORGIA  talk  19:37, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

February 2014

 * I am making a big contribution to KA Wikipedia, and already know how to write on wikipedia. block is no longer needed, because I understand why I was blocked, will not continue to cause damage or destruction, and I make a useful contribution instead. -- MEDGEORGIA  talk  10:44, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

The last attempt
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the Arbitration Committee's Ban Appeals Subcommittee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Daniel Case (talk) 19:38, 9 December 2014 (UTC)